Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

**Fenwick** · 03-14-2013

Originally Posted by Potemy

I think it's legal, but very odd.

Yes but i have 5 injuries..

And Ayman , your formation is illegal , you have just one middle player and you could have 3

**dv8r** · 03-14-2013

Originally Posted by Fenwick

Yes but i have 5 injuries..

And Ayman , your formation is illegal , you have just one middle player and you could have 3

No, it's not illegal. I have used that formation before without any problems

**hullabaloo** · 03-14-2013

what about using two DM next to each other?

or using to AMC next to each other behind two strikers?

**dv8r** · 03-14-2013

Originally Posted by hullabaloo

what about using two DM next to each other?

or using to AMC next to each other behind two strikers?

I have never seen 2 AMC behind 2 strikers but it doesn't sound like an illegal formation

**Potemy** · 03-15-2013

Originally Posted by hullabaloo

what about using two DM next to each other?

or using to AMC next to each other behind two strikers?

Legal, but you'll also have to look at other parts of the formation.

**Razz** · 03-15-2013

Originally Posted by Fenwick

I want to know if my formation it's illegal or no ?
Attachment 3432

No. GK must be a natural GK

**bobdylan** · 03-16-2013

I was hoping to run with
DC. DC.
DMR. DML
MC MC MC
AMR. AML.
FC

So I'm guessing it's illegal due to the two DC's ? That's lame

**funky** · 03-16-2013

how about that its illegal or not?

**Potemy** · 03-16-2013

Legal.

**kamillu** · 03-16-2013

Originally Posted by funky

how about that its illegal or not?

surely legal

View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?