View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 16 of 44 FirstFirst ... 6141516171826 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #151
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Posts
    26
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-illegal.jpg

    Weirdest formation ever.

    Anyway, do you guys usually try to beat illegal formations using different formations to match them?

  2. #152
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Fireb Ourne View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	illegal.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	90.0 KB 
ID:	5104

    Weirdest formation ever.

    Anyway, do you guys usually try to beat illegal formations using different formations to match them?
    Sure. Against that, you'd put in minimum defenders, maximum attackers.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  3. #153
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5
    So this formation is legal? :

    -----ST--ST---
    ---------------
    ML-----------MR
    ---DMC--DMC-
    DL--DC--DC--DR

  4. #154
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Today saw the match. One team plays 3W-2(DMC)-3W-1-1.
    In the middle of 2-nd half (score 1-1) hid DC was injured. No substitution was done. So the formation appeared as 2(DR+DL)-2(DMC)-3W-1-1. He lost 1-2. But the game continued to be equal !!! He really didn't lost possession. Does it means that playing with 2 defenders is "legal" since today ???

  5. #155
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Eindbaas View Post
    So this formation is legal? :

    -----ST--ST---
    ---------------
    ML-----------MR
    ---DMC--DMC-
    DL--DC--DC--DR
    Yes it's legal (at least in NORDEUS point of view)

  6. #156
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    As I have read this post it seems to me as the following should be Ilegal, or?

    ----ST--ST--ST----
    --------AMC-------
    -----MC--MC----
    -------DMC--------
    ----DC--DC----DR--

  7. #157
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    Guys... im really lost, i didnt even know there was bad formation...
    i used an formation against the last team "an boot" i was in the first place... and to my surprise i lost 5-0
    the formation was
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-team.jpg

    This was an illegal formation?

  8. #158
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by adminlvieira View Post
    Guys... im really lost, i didnt even know there was bad formation...
    i used an formation against the last team "an boot" i was in the first place... and to my surprise i lost 5-0
    the formation was
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	team.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	49.9 KB 
ID:	5510

    This was an illegal formation?

    Yes
    only one defender - illegal formation

  9. #159
    Newbie beekhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Phnom Penh, Cambodia
    Posts
    4
    It is legal for my format below? Please advice.

    ---ST----ST----
    ------AMC------
    ML----MC----MR
    DL--DC--DC--DR

  10. #160
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bend,Oregon
    Posts
    4
    It is a touchy spot because what if u want to run a 4-2-4 and play long ball to your FWDS.U would then penalize the player for having 4 def 2 mids and 4 fwds..That would not be right.

Page 16 of 44 FirstFirst ... 6141516171826 ... LastLast