View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    163
    How come this is an illegal formation? Is it true that there must be at least one MC?
    By the way, what formation would you have used against the team on the right?
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-img_5967.jpg

  2. #2
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Sih View Post
    How come this is an illegal formation? Is it true that there must be at least one MC?
    By the way, what formation would you have used against the team on the right?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5967.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	99.4 KB 
ID:	10804

    • Goalkeeper (Must be player's natural position i.e. a GK) **
    • Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row )
    • At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the D(L/R), DM(L/R), M(L/R), AM(L/R) slots}
    • at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be an DM* or M*
    • At least 4 players on the opponents side of the pitch.
    • at least 1 Striker


    It meets all the known requirements, therefore:

    6. Post-match results are inconclusive for various reasons. If a formation appears to be legal, but shows a 20% possession in post-match results (one you didn't watch), first check the GK in the game - if that is his natural position, and you find no other reason for the possession penalty, test the formation yourself. If it IS illegal, make a screenshot and post here please.


    There could be several reasons for the 20% possession other than the formation shown being illegal. Some of these include: severe disparity in team quality, changes in formation after the match started, red cards, or injuries. Often a non-GK in the GK position will result in 20% possession for an otherwise legal formation.

    Or you may have discovered something nobody else has recorded so far.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  3. #3
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Perry Sih View Post
    How come this is an illegal formation? Is it true that there must be at least one MC?
    By the way, what formation would you have used against the team on the right?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5967.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	99.4 KB 
ID:	10804
    Preliminary testing confirms that 4w-0-2w-2n-2 IS illegal.
    Moving one of the AMCs to MC resulted in a legal formation.

    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-4w-0-2w-2n-2-illegal.jpgDefinitive Illegal Formation Rules-4w-0-2w-2n-2-adjust.jpg

    Previous testing has shown that an MC is NOT required IF you have a DMC. Will have to follow up on this and see if a DMC or DML or DMR makes it legal.

    Thanks for posting.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  4. #4
    VIP pnr8555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post
    Preliminary testing confirms that 4w-0-2w-2n-2 IS illegal.
    Moving one of the AMCs to MC resulted in a legal formation.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4w-0-2w-2n-2 illegal.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	92.5 KB 
ID:	11142Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4w-0-2w-2n-2 adjust.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	75.6 KB 
ID:	11143

    Previous testing has shown that an MC is NOT required IF you have a DMC. Will have to follow up on this and see if a DMC or DML or DMR makes it legal.

    Thanks for posting.
    To be illegal formation, it has to be 20% ball poscession, not 30...

    ๑๐
    ทรงพระเจริญ

    AEPRE FC

  5. #5
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by pnr8555 View Post
    To be illegal formation, it has to be 20% ball poscession, not 30...
    Look again and re-read
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~