View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 32 of 43 FirstFirst ... 22303132333442 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-formation.jpg
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?

  2. #2
    Champion Saransh Vatsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,814
    Quote Originally Posted by Little_camel View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	formation.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	100.0 KB 
ID:	15208
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?
    I don't know why this happened??? 4-1-2-1-2 ND is a legal formation d is widely used, it is one of my fav. Other things also seem fine. Was ur opponent much higher Quality than u????

  3. #3
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Little_camel View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	formation.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	100.0 KB 
ID:	15208
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?
    Can you post some screenshots showing the possession, and the opponent's team?
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  4. #4
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by JanCz View Post
    I've a cup opponnent who set his tactic in strange way like this:
    GK-DL-DC-DMC-ML-MC-MC-AMC-AMC-ST-ST. I suppose it's illegal because number of defenders, but this gut is experienced and his team is strong, so I'm not sure if this is illegal. Could you guys confirm?
    Two backline defenders makes it illegal, yes. Also, no right winger makes it illegal.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    27
    Is this a Illegal formation

    3 X DC
    1XDMR
    1X ML
    3XMC
    2X SC??

  6. #6
    Newbie Vasilis Zafeiriou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    13
    no. for being illigal you have to play with less than 3 defenders or no wings at all or no striker at all(you need at least 1) or less than 3 midfielders. Midfielders, are the next possitions dm c,r,l m c,r,l and am c,r,l

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    25
    how to counter 5-2-1AMR-2?

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1
    is 4-3-2-1 a illegal tactic???
    st
    amc---amc
    mc_mc_mc
    dr_dc--dc_dr
    Last edited by Darshan Deshpande; 12-25-2013 at 02:14 AM.

  9. #9
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    It is a standard tactic, not illegal if you meant dl dc dc dr
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    6
    ------st------
    aml-------amr
    -----mc------
    dml--dmc-amr
    --dc-dc-dc--
    Is this formation legal?from the basic rules I read from above it's ok,but I have an important match tonight and I wont take any risk

Page 32 of 43 FirstFirst ... 22303132333442 ... LastLast