Last edited by Osmund Bakkevig; 03-19-2014 at 04:37 PM.
Is 3dc-3mc-1amc-3st illiegal formation?
It just means he's got 20% possession, it doesnt mean he necessarily has to lose![]()
I have used thousands of formations and the truth of the matter is, top eleven still remains work in progress in terms of giving the WIN to the person playing a good formations.
I have lost to this formation too many times with less stars.
NO striker
Amc-----------AMC
MR-----------------------ML
DC ----DC---------------------DML
DC------------MC--------DL
GK
Something like this. So if you have the quality players, the better formation clearly ; whats the reason to why someone would loose not one...two ..or three....6 matches or more to someone with a formation that is un heard of in real life. Common now...its all money for top eleven.
yup it is...
At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the DL/DR, DML/DMR, ML/MR, AML/AMR slots}
BLAUGRANA FC - The road to success...Team Showcase: http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...wiss-team.html
7x 4x Runner-ups 3x 1x
Unfreaking Beleivable
Can anyone anywhere please explain how I managed to loose my Cup quarter finals game to a weaker team by almost 3 stars
and with a TOTALLY ILLEGAL FORMATION he had 2 dcs, dml, dmr, 3mcs, aml, amr, and a striker! The crazy thing is that
this guy was at the game and played the whole game with that formation then won 4-2!!!!@#$#$
The only logical explanation is that I am Canadian after 16 seasons of putting up with this kind of ludicrous ch_ _, I am speaking out.
I pay to play around $200. a month and all I would like is that they play fair!!!
Absolutly DISCUSTED!
...and where is the "illegal formation"?..He played a 4-3N-2W-1..that's all!