46Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
What a weird rule, have they never seen a formation in real football with one MC?
What a weird rule, have they never seen a formation in real football with one MC?
As far as I know:
4-3W-3, 5-3W-2, 3n-2wdm-mc-2wam-2, 3n-3wdm-2wam-2
how to beat this?
4-3w-3 seems to be back to normal...
Thanks for informationOriginally Posted by Kylos
4-3w-3 seems to be back to normal...
That is weird lol. Anyway i'm not going to use 43w3.
2DC-2(DML/DMR)-2MCs-AMC/AML/AMR-ST - this is illegal formation, so far he won every game in our league. any ideas on countering it?
yepp played against them seem no penalties in possession !! WTF?
that put in bed the 3 at back minimum theory , seem 2 is more than enough if they have DML/DMR
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
I used this tactic today. Not seriously, I'm trying to stay below the 7th in the League. But, to my surprise, my team did not lose possession (far from the 20% expected).
and here, a more radical example:
You have dmcs,which can take place of dcs for necessity...I used this tactic today. Not seriously, I'm trying to stay below the 7th in the League. But, to my surprise, my team did not lose possession (far from the 20% expected).
and here, a more radical example:
Reply With Quote
