View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 41 of 44 FirstFirst ... 313940414243 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #401
    VIP t11_fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,435
    That is weird lol. Anyway i'm not going to use 43w3.

  2. #402
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    73
    2DC-2(DML/DMR)-2MCs-AMC/AML/AMR-ST - this is illegal formation, so far he won every game in our league. any ideas on countering it?

  3. #403
    Rookie Ami 47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Kylos View Post
    4-3w-3 seems to be back to normal...

    Attachment 30142

    Attachment 30143
    Thanks for information
    Kylos likes this.

  4. #404
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Beograd
    Posts
    11,102
    Now this is trolling... and I'm really

    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-4a.jpg

    And opponent played this formation entire game

    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-6.jpg

  5. #405
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3
    I watched two games: in the first game, the one team had only one player at the sides and the possession was only 56-44 against him (his rival played a legal 4-3N-2W-1).
    In the second game, one team had 3 players at the left and the possession was only 39-61 against him and he even managed to win a legal 4-4-2 (for this game i can give a screenshot).

    So, they may have changed the rules about illegal formations

  6. #406
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New York, New York, United States
    Posts
    15
    Is 3N-2(DMC)-2(MC)-2W-1 a legal formation?

  7. #407
    VIP t11_fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,435
    Quote Originally Posted by swelzfc View Post
    Is 3N-2(DMC)-2(MC)-2W-1 a legal formation?
    Yes, It is legal

  8. #408
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New York, New York, United States
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by t11_fan View Post
    Yes, It is legal
    Great, planning to use in a league rematch.

  9. #409
    Newbie Theodor Dinu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    40
    Here's a formation that should be considered illegal per your second rule (Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row [DL, DC, DR] )) , but as you can see, it's not. I've considered recently trying a formation with 2 DCs and 3 DMs (DML, DMR, DMR) and I don't think it should be deemed illegal as well.

    View image: Screenshot (29)
    Manager of Invictus

  10. #410
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Quote Originally Posted by Theodor Dinu View Post
    Here's a formation that should be considered illegal per your second rule (Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row [DL, DC, DR] )) , but as you can see, it's not. I've considered recently trying a formation with 2 DCs and 3 DMs (DML, DMR, DMR) and I don't think it should be deemed illegal as well.

    View image: Screenshot (29)
    Formation rules and penatlies are 'not as intended' at the moment

Page 41 of 44 FirstFirst ... 313940414243 ... LastLast