Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

[Charlie Swb]

Those rules are not true
Need new rule

[Razz]

Those rules are not true
Need new rule

Care to elaborate?

[CIBlue]

Those rules are not true
Need new rule

You were probably losing because your opponent controlled the midfield with more midfielders.

[Acenk Ugi Yugi Dipawirana]

--- --- ST --- ---
AML--AMC---AMR
-- --- --- CMF----
-- DMC --- DMR
DL DC DC ---

(formasi ideal)

[markiinhobr]

I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal

[Razz]

I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal

3w-1-3w-1-2 is a legal formation.
3n-1-3w-1-2 or 3w-1-3n-1-2 are both legal too.
3n-1-3n-1-2 would be illegal.

I hope that answers your question. Although I'm not even sure if you are asking a question because your translator is garbage. The mods might get mad, but I'd suggest posting both the translation and your native language.

[andrayen]

about an illegal formation
when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

---st---st---
-aml----amr-
---mc--mc---
-dml----dmr-
---dc--dc---
-----gk-----

is it still call Illegal..?

[fadhul17]

about an illegal formation
when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

---st---st---
-aml----amr-
---mc--mc---
-dml----dmr-
---dc--dc---
-----gk-----

is it still call Illegal..?

Yup it's illegal. I hve tested it, and got 20% ball possession.
My advice remove ur striker to defender. And up to 2dc, down to dc.

[bogdann]

about an illegal formation
when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

---st---st---
-aml----amr-
---mc--mc---
-dml----dmr-
---dc--dc---
-----gk-----

is it still call Illegal..?

yes it is,you need 3+ defenders

[Pete Cuffe]

i played a superb bot robot, won 3-1 just, he had three gk on the pitch and got 46% possesion, so its all utter rubbish really, beat the top of league yesterday 4-1-3w-1-2 wide diamond with 4-1-1-1-3 by accident, forgot to watch + 5 away team won 2-0 haha this is 5th season and ive spent £13 ! a fool and his football are soon skint, ktf