View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Wiki Contributor Incredipede's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Mount Everest
    Posts
    653
    I've seen a picture on which 4-3-4 is illegal, what is the cause? [DC, DC, DC | ML, MC, MC, MR | ST, ST, ST]

    The same happened on a 4-5-1 formation [DL, DC, DC, DR | ML, MC, MC, MC, MR | ST]

    Players with this color are greyed out for some reason in the formation! Does anyone know what caused the 80% / 20% Possession?


  2. #2
    Apprentice flatthg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    I've seen a picture on which 4-3-4 is illegal, what is the cause? [DC, DC, DC | ML, MC, MC, MR | ST, ST, ST]

    The same happened on a 4-5-1 formation [DL, DC, DC, DR | ML, MC, MC, MC, MR | ST]

    Players with this color are greyed out for some reason in the formation! Does anyone know what caused the 80% / 20% Possession?
    might be red card players.

  3. #3
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    I've seen a picture on which 4-3-4 is illegal, what is the cause? [DC, DC, DC | ML, MC, MC, MR | ST, ST, ST]

    The same happened on a 4-5-1 formation [DL, DC, DC, DR | ML, MC, MC, MC, MR | ST]
    Both formations with red carded players resulted in formations with no flankers on right side.
    Last edited by Razz; 07-25-2013 at 05:17 PM.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  4. #4
    Rookie Flinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    I've seen a picture on which 4-3-4 is illegal, what is the cause? [DC, DC, DC | ML, MC, MC, MR | ST, ST, ST]

    The same happened on a 4-5-1 formation [DL, DC, DC, DR | ML, MC, MC, MC, MR | ST]

    Players with this color are greyed out for some reason in the formation! Does anyone know what caused the 80% / 20% Possession?
    4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper

    Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
    Last edited by Flinger; 07-22-2013 at 04:07 PM.

  5. #5
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper

    Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
    Presumably the red cards occurred during the match.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~