46Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksmight be red card players.Originally Posted by Confuzzled
might be red card players.
seems legit to me
That's fine.
3 defenders, a player on each flanks and a striker, that's okay!
๑๐
ทรงพระเจริญ
AEPRE FC
Both formations with red carded players resulted in formations with no flankers on right side.
Last edited by Razz; 07-25-2013 at 06:17 PM.
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
Does this formations are illegal 3-3-1-3-----4-3-3?
4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper
Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
Last edited by Flinger; 07-22-2013 at 05:07 PM.
So Illegal formation is when more than 2 players are not on their positions?
Strange that this illegal formation is able to hold up...
Presumably the red cards occurred during the match.4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper
Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
No. Please re-read the first post in this thread.
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
So if my opponent has a defender on position of GK, striker on position of a defender, DMC in midfield and MC on striker position he'll have normal ball possession?
Reply With Quote