View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 34 of 44 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #331
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by Francesko901 View Post
    Why you are expecting any penalty? He has two players in the midfield, at least one players on each wing... I think the lost of the possesion is due to the lost of the player. His formation is still legal, IMHO.
    Yes. u r right! he knows what the illegal formation is. That's why he changed his MR to Mc immediately after his MC sent-off.
    but... at least 3 midfielders, not 2, please double check?
    Last edited by Belgji; 01-04-2014 at 07:40 PM.

  2. #332
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    21
    hi,

    why this saison, i can let play my gk as a mc/st and it was not a illegal formation? if i make that i have normal ball possesion over 50%

  3. #333
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    Really? I find that odd, but then I never play my GK anywhere but goal.
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #334
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascha View Post
    hi,

    why this season, i can let play my gk as a mc/st and it was not a illegal formation? if i make that i have normal ball possession over 50%
    Because it is not illegal to let your player play on field different from his specialization (1 to 3 fields out of all 14 fields). When your player plays on fields his is not specialized to, his performance his slightly worse, but if his skills are huge he still could play better than opponents player on right field. In the end you lose some ball possession by player on wrong field, but it could be from 1 to 5 % (no one knows because Nordeus has not revealed game equation yet nor tells us exactly the penalization for playing players on wrong fields).

    So, having GK on ST field (instead of ST) is better than have no ST, because formation without any ST is illegal. But no one knows if it is better to have on ST field brilliant GK with high attacking skills or ST with skills under average. And no one knows what is the skill compensation for playing wrong field (let us say e.g. that playing on ST without specialization to ST reduces all skills of such a player by 5 points during such a match). I think Nordeus owes us such an explanation.

  5. #335
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    Good topic this, think a moderator should make it a sticky thread perhaps, many managers still don't even know what exactly an illegal formation is.
    i think so , has been sticked

  6. #336
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Belgji View Post
    Yes. u r right! he knows what the illegal formation is. That's why he changed his MR to Mc immediately after his MC sent-off.
    but... at least 3 midfielders, not 2, please double check?
    Chris Rath already answered your question above.
    If you think the rules as posted here are wrong, you can easily check by playing a friendly with a questionable formation.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  7. #337
    Dreamer fugazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    310
    Can someone explain what happened my last match? Or is it just a fluke result.

    I was playing against an illegal formation. 3N-1-3N-3N. My players lvl is higher then his and I played 4-3N-2W-1, (V-style, with the DMC changed for a MC and arrows on the DR/DC) Obviously, my opponent got 20% possesion, he also suffered 2 injuries midgame but I still lost 1-0. Now I'm knocked out in the prelims again on conceded home goals. Shots were just 10-12 in my advantage. How is this possible, or am I missing something tactic wise?

  8. #338
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
    Can someone explain what happened my last match? Or is it just a fluke result.

    I was playing against an illegal formation. 3N-1-3N-3N. My players lvl is higher then his and I played 4-3N-2W-1, (V-style, with the DMC changed for a MC and arrows on the DR/DC) Obviously, my opponent got 20% possesion, he also suffered 2 injuries midgame but I still lost 1-0. Now I'm knocked out in the prelims again on conceded home goals. Shots were just 10-12 in my advantage. How is this possible, or am I missing something tactic wise?
    Just bad luck /troll result? How were your shots on target? 80% possession is no guarantee of victory.
    Did you adjust your tactics at all ... focus passing down the flanks should (theoretically) be good against that.
    In the end, i'd say just bad luck ..
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  9. #339
    Dreamer fugazi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    310
    Hmm, I replied already yesterday, but for some reason I got the msg saying its awaiting approval? Maybe too lengthy for using quick reply? I expected it to be here already? Ah well, not going to rewrite everything. I will nevertheless summarize it.

    Shots on target 3-5 in his favor. Unfortunately I couldn't watch the match. Must admit I underestimated it otherwise I'ld have made sure I could . I'm quite sure I could've turned it as I played my young fast trainer with my best striker on the bench, or red arrows added on my AML/R. I guess this is the main reason, without arrows on the wingers my striker was too weak on his own. And well, his strikers were strong, so a goal against is always a possibility against 3 of them.

    Lesson learned I guess... even if it's a bit trollish.

  10. #340
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1
    So I'm new to this: do I need a ML and an MR to make this legal?
    ST -- ST
    -- -- AMC -- --
    -- MC -- MC --
    -- -- DMC -- --
    DL DC --- DC DR
    GK

Page 34 of 44 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast