Like Tactician said, "2 high quality teams, 1 medium-high quality team, 4-5 medium quality teams and the rest can be mid-low and low quality teams". This formula would be much better for active users putting time and money into their team. Its understandable that lower quality teams want to win trophies but in order to do so, they have to put the effort into their team. Its not fair to managers investing in their teams, only to lose to lower quality, inactive managers. So in my opinion the above statement would be the best outcome, and more sensible.