Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* If these rules work concistently like they should, results should be reproducable in order for it to be called a game instead of a slotmachine.
Exactly. notice how there are minimal instructions on a slot machine?

Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* I don´t mind losing to a team if I clearly should have, based on a paper rock scissors format, which in essence all games are, as opposed to slotmachines.
there are even better odds in rock paper scissors and certain outcomes are more predictable.

Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* So far the only things that are concistent in the game are based on a businessmodel.
This is only obvious to some. others say this game is fair, blah blah blah but its made to suck as much money as they can with the semblance of a game. time to make it an actual game with actual rules and then you will see more money come in. Cant believe they dont realize this. But it makes me think, do they have the skill and programming knowledge to do it? Based on the past 2 years, they dont have the skill, its pretty obvious.

Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* The 2 things that trump everything over a period of time are the 2 variables closest related to Token spending, quality and marketvalue, and to be fair, they should.
Well this game was made only to make money, so yes, its quite obvious.

Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* Another thing is that abandoned teams, or managers who don´t watch their matches, many times perform better then they should to be called fair.
They wouldnt be able to profess so many accounts playing if they got rid of the abandoned teams. Frankly I dont think they have as much players as they claim. Get rid of all the bots and they go from 10 million to 2 million and then how many multi-accounts? cant be more than a couple hundred thousand. but they are managerless, they shouldnt have direction and therefore should not win as often.

Quote Originally Posted by fugazi View Post
* I am leaning more and more towards the notion this is not a pay to win game literally, perhaps even closer to pay to lose by the way Nordeus pairs teams together in competitions.
dude I couldnt have said it better. well, maybe I could - it is pay to win per se, but its most like: "pay to win, but the more you pay, the more we will make you lose when you think you should have won, in effect, to make you more frustrated which will make you pay more to increase your teams quality and MORE MONEY FOR US!"