Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
the problem with that littledude, is that the commentary is severely lacking in overall content. you notice one AMC with blue arrows defend once and you cant assume he does it all game. the commentary is plain horrible and one of the worst aspects of the game. Hence the competition for the commentary, I believe. The team at nordeus lacks the imaginative skills to do any commentary because they are programmers, not football connoisseurs, and THAT is painfully obvious. need I say that the commentary is repetitive and boring and lacking in any useful information that one could use towards a meaningful substitution or formation/tactic change.

so all that to say that the commentary really doesnt show the effects of arrows. seriously, I have seen my DR in the commentary go up and cross, which is what they should do, and there were no red arrows. I have seen this happen to my DC as well, with no arrows. so they go up and sit in the 18 yard box and walk the ball into the net sometimes and arrows have nothing to do with it. it is just seriously bad programming.

they lost the plot on the arrows.
agreed there, but these arent just one offs per match. they happen a lot TBH. set a friendly against an evenly matched team, set your back to blue and your fronts to red, long ball quick counter. usually quick counters start at the wings (where the SAMs might be). why would a S/CB start the counter, and end it with another S/CB?

the QA about arrows sort of hints they do move players. im guessing they forgot they havent added a cap since these things happen fairly often. along with a bunch of other things

that comment about the commentaries made sense. it was suggested once, and it was done within a few days. expect the new update to have 'now added more commentaries' or whatnot