Arrows.

[Saransh Vatsa]

oh no lol xxx your banned for closing this topic lol !!!!!!!!!!!!
I seriously want to know as I have a red arrow on you !!!!!!!!

U r banned for banning me on the wrong thread.
If i am scoring withthe red, let it be, down tamper or fidget with me, i will be fine lols

[Mo Meow Odom]

Don't you just hate this forum though when someone says an opinion (yes opinion ) and people just jump on saying how wrong you are (without any proof ) and being unhelpful and rude !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we in america call them rednecks !!!!!!! lol I believe in UK they are twats what are they in India ???? lol

this is not rude I want to know

[Saransh Vatsa]

Don't you just hate this forum though when someone says an opinion (yes opinion ) and people just jump on saying how wrong you are (without any proof ) and being unhelpful and rude !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we in america call them rednecks !!!!!!! lol I believe in UK they are twats what are they in India ???? lol

this is not rude I want to know

We have many terms for them, i know the american version from Greenday song American Idiot, that line"Don't u wanna be a part of the redneck agenda" lol
They try to prove a point, words seem harsh when read sometimes even if they are not intnded, chill, don't get angry at erything, they don't have any harsh tone to their point....

[Mo Meow Odom]

We have many terms for them, i know the american version from Greenday song American Idiot, that line"Don't u wanna be a part of the redneck agenda" lol
They try to prove a point, words seem harsh when read sometimes even if they are not intnded, chill, don't get angry at erything, they don't have any harsh tone to their point....

lol My step dad just told me the same lol oops sorry and he also told me they are more Chavs than Twats lol apparently twats is a very rude word so I appologise for saying it ( Saransh you know who my step dad is ) he is going to ban me if I continue he dosn't care less what people say or how they say it and I just got a big telling off ( oops ) lol !!!!!!! (btw he is laughing now )

[Saransh Vatsa]

lol My step dad just told me the same lol oops sorry and he also told me they are more Chavs than Twats lol apparently twats is a very rude word so I appologise for saying it ( Saransh you know who my step dad is ) he is going to ban me if I continue he dosn't care less what people say or how they say it and I just got a big telling off ( oops ) lol !!!!!!! (btw he is laughing now )

Chill.... Don't take internet world seriously, and enable ur PM pls for 15 mins, i need to tell u something important

[Mo Meow Odom]

done !!!!!!!!!!!

[Mo Meow Odom]

I'm sure some will say it's wrong hun but believe me when I say sounds good to me and you even explained why !!!!

Thanks hun (not too far from what Phil said ) xxx

[littledude072]

read through that too and was surprised. sure i may be only level 8 and am still considered to be noobish, but not when it comes to computers, gaming, and scripting ;P

technically, no positions were made for L/RF (left/right forwards) so that answer may be a random guesstimation by support. how their script handles a CF with red (and backs with blue) has been gathered through users reporting their experiences. if the script still ad/devance players with arrows SAMs (side attacking mids) should become like SBs (side backs). it doesnt turn them into that position, but more like a hybrid makeshift. they still do roles for their main position, but also do their makeshift position
lets take SAMs and SBs for example: SAMs still attack, and SBs still defend, but slightly less. sure youll still read SAMs try to whiz around the field, but have you noticed they also defend? its also funny reading backliners go on a frenzy during a counter with blue arrows

[rastaman70]

read through that too and was surprised. sure i may be only level 8 and am still considered to be noobish, but not when it comes to computers, gaming, and scripting ;P

technically, no positions were made for L/RF (left/right forwards) so that answer may be a random guesstimation by support. how their script handles a CF with red (and backs with blue) has been gathered through users reporting their experiences. if the script still ad/devance players with arrows SAMs (side attacking mids) should become like SBs (side backs). it doesnt turn them into that position, but more like a hybrid makeshift. they still do roles for their main position, but also do their makeshift position
lets take SAMs and SBs for example: SAMs still attack, and SBs still defend, but slightly less. sure youll still read SAMs try to whiz around the field, but have you noticed they also defend? its also funny reading backliners go on a frenzy during a counter with blue arrows

the problem with that littledude, is that the commentary is severely lacking in overall content. you notice one AMC with blue arrows defend once and you cant assume he does it all game. the commentary is plain horrible and one of the worst aspects of the game. Hence the competition for the commentary, I believe. The team at nordeus lacks the imaginative skills to do any commentary because they are programmers, not football connoisseurs, and THAT is painfully obvious. need I say that the commentary is repetitive and boring and lacking in any useful information that one could use towards a meaningful substitution or formation/tactic change.

so all that to say that the commentary really doesnt show the effects of arrows. seriously, I have seen my DR in the commentary go up and cross, which is what they should do, and there were no red arrows. I have seen this happen to my DC as well, with no arrows. so they go up and sit in the 18 yard box and walk the ball into the net sometimes and arrows have nothing to do with it. it is just seriously bad programming.

they lost the plot on the arrows.

[littledude072]

the problem with that littledude, is that the commentary is severely lacking in overall content. you notice one AMC with blue arrows defend once and you cant assume he does it all game. the commentary is plain horrible and one of the worst aspects of the game. Hence the competition for the commentary, I believe. The team at nordeus lacks the imaginative skills to do any commentary because they are programmers, not football connoisseurs, and THAT is painfully obvious. need I say that the commentary is repetitive and boring and lacking in any useful information that one could use towards a meaningful substitution or formation/tactic change.

so all that to say that the commentary really doesnt show the effects of arrows. seriously, I have seen my DR in the commentary go up and cross, which is what they should do, and there were no red arrows. I have seen this happen to my DC as well, with no arrows. so they go up and sit in the 18 yard box and walk the ball into the net sometimes and arrows have nothing to do with it. it is just seriously bad programming.

they lost the plot on the arrows.

agreed there, but these arent just one offs per match. they happen a lot TBH. set a friendly against an evenly matched team, set your back to blue and your fronts to red, long ball quick counter. usually quick counters start at the wings (where the SAMs might be). why would a S/CB start the counter, and end it with another S/CB?

the QA about arrows sort of hints they do move players. im guessing they forgot they havent added a cap since these things happen fairly often. along with a bunch of other things

that comment about the commentaries made sense. it was suggested once, and it was done within a few days. expect the new update to have 'now added more commentaries' or whatnot