81Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Nash, so you would have preferred to face a 7-star team in the final and lose the tournament? What kind of logic is that? You should be happy you won the tournament because you could have been knocked out in the semi-final.
If some users used good means for improving their teams to 7 or 8 stars, why should they be 'penalised' by making them facing other 7-8-star teams? They have the 'right' to face lower quality teams. They deserve to have that advantage. Don't be biased; don't try to make things only to your advantage. As long as users are not cheating or using improper means to boost the quality of their teams or to fool the draws, there should be no problem.
Based on your way of thinking, Barcelona has to face Real Madrid each time and one will be at the bottom of the rankings and the other will be at the top or each will cancel each other and be in the middle while smaller, much weaker teams will be at the top. This is wrong.
I see what is your problem. You want those 7-star or so associations that are currently at the top to have less chance by making each of them face each other just because they have stronger teams. But that is not correct. This is not fair. They deserve to have the quality advantage if they worked for it or used good means.
If those at the top currently faced much weaker teams in the first tournament, that does not mean they will face weaker teams again and again later on. They will drop points at some point by facing other strong teams or just like you knocked out one 7-star team using a weaker team in the semi-final, especially if they are poor in tactics and depend only on quality advantage.
So, cheer up.
But, I request every user to report any suspicious teams they encounter or see. Those that use wrong or unfair means should be punished.
