Ridiculus draws

[khris]

I still looking the game as the first season I played. lol

Thats why I keep doing the same in general terms and essence, just yea, one year ago something happenned to the ST's and many users had the same perception...

Strange that with Av-Q differance you had this situation... of course one thing is the Av. Q and another the 11 vs 11 quality... so big, of +40Q was the differance under field?

[Tactician]

I still looking the game as the first season I played. lol

Thats why I keep doing the same in general terms and essence, just yea, one year ago something happenned to the ST's and many users had the same perception...

Strange that with Av-Q differance you had this situation... of course one thing is the Av. Q and another the 11 vs 11 quality... so big, of +40Q was the differance under field?

Yes, because you are another type of player - the one that depended mainly an quality advantage, though you adjusted things during matches. But even that won't work now as such, because the matches are more like on playback. The final outcomes as such are more or less fully pre-determined before the matches have actually shown to start. Sure, you have not noticed much difference because what is now in the game is a bit like it was back in 2015, but not like it was during April-June this year. For those that depended on tactics mainly, they will surely notice the change.

[khris]

Yes, because you are another type of player - the one that depended mainly an quality advanatage, though you adjusted things during matches. But even that won't work now as such, because the matches are more like on playback. Sure, you have not noticed much different because what is now in the game is a bit like it was back in 2015, but not like it was during April-June this year.

I only know that as before, when a player dont appear and I do a sub', tend to work, even moving players between lines has worked for me,,, lets say the amr- is active trying to attack and the amc do not so, I invert the positions and I see often a effect and etc of live actions that I tend to do..

Since I started I considered that all formations can win all and that this is about how are internally programmed the players so, for me all is have 1-2 basic strategies and discard players that don't work. Keep players with good internal %s and try to oversize phisical skills to face 1 to 1 others with more stars...

By my side I can not say that is a playback, because I do actions during the game and I still experiencing a effect.

Really I would like to see the 2 11's that are mentioned in the thread now, is not so usual 8 with stars diferance xD

[Tactician]

I only know that as before, when a player dont appear and I do a sub', tend to work, even moving players between lines has worked for me,,, lets say the amr- is active trying to attack and the amc do not so, I invert the positions and I see often a effect and etc of live actions that I tend to do..

Since I started I considered that all formations can win all and that this is about how are internally programmed the players so, for me all is have 1-2 basic strategies and discard players that don't work. Keep players with good internal %s and try to oversize phisical skills to face 1 to 1 others with more stars...

By my side I can not say that is a playback, because I do actions during the game and I still experiencing a effect.

Really I would like to see the 2 11's that are mentioned in the thread now, is not so usual 8 with stars diferance xD

You simply caused a re-calculation; sometimes the re-calculation was in your favor and sometimes not. It may not be about what you did as such in terms of football. But now, even causing the re-calculation does not have much effect, that is, it won't change much in terms of the final outcome as such, which is why I described the matches as being on playback. In other words, you can sit back, eat peanuts and win (or lose).