New challenge during league - U23 goals

[nash123]

We had a long time, where young players were "better", player older than 25 were worthless. At the moment, it seems players getting better the older they are. I don't want back the old system. I like to keep player like Kraxner, Costa, Weigl,... to keep them her whole career.

[Matteo de Clemente]

We had a long time, where young players were "better", player older than 25 were worthless. At the moment, it seems players getting better the older they are. I don't want back the old system. I like to keep player like Kraxner, Costa, Weigl,... to keep them her whole career.

Sure,it's a good thing that old system was trashed,as it was useless and dangerous over players improvement.

But what we lost is the chance to be competitive even when not a token buyer,and lots of teams, leagues and levels too.

This was not a consequence of new system ,as lots of complaints arose with old system too.

It's only a Nordeus strategy and I suppose that who has to know about disasters,
is aware by now.

[goldsilvy]

I reckon it's a good addition, there are many variations that be introduced (ratings, assists, clean sheets etc, fair play - least yellow/red cards).

They (Nordeus) are trying something new which is not detrimental to the overall game. Obviously the usual nay-sayers can always find a negative in everything.

Potential winnings of up to 10 tokens for a six day challenge are quite attractive, bearing in mind the sponsorhsip is only 35 tokens/seasons, and most association rewards are 50 or fewer tokens.

[achiie]

@SOLID

So, every week we will get some new challenge and not only limited to U23. That's pretty cool.
TBH , after a long time i'm getting good vibes from Nordeus.

One other thing, i'm really interested in knowing is your views on the Token prize for top 10 teams.I think most of the teams competing for top 10 spots are just tricking the system.
A slight change here which may seem small and doesn't affect 99.9% of managers may increase the overall integrity within the game.Don't you think so?

How do you justify giving them tokens?

PS: Just sharing my thoughts as you asked.

[raj9]

@SOLID

So, every week we will get some new challenge and not only limited to U23. That's pretty cool.
TBH , after a long time i'm getting good vibes from Nordeus.

One other thing, i'm really interested in knowing is your views on the Token prize for top 10 teams.I think most of the teams competing for top 10 spots are just tricking the system.
A slight change here which may seem small and doesn't affect 99.9% of managers may increase the overall integrity within the game.Don't you think so?

How do you justify giving them tokens?

PS: Just sharing my thoughts as you asked.

Same question from my side @SOLID

[SOLID]

@achiee and @raj9

Currently we're testing this on for a season or two, if a lot of people participate and like the challenges - we'll be issuing more. I can't give you a 'hard' promise just yet, but it's very probable that we'll be issuing challenges more often in the future.

For the concerns, I am not sure I really understand correctly? Are we talking about people competing for the weekly challenge prizes within the league or?

[achiie]

@SOLID

My concern above was regarding Top 10 Associations worldwide competing for 100T in Association matches,if you guys can at least discuss about it in your meetings. It would be great.

[SOLID]

@achiie

If we're talking about the challenge, it's going to be rolled out in non-association leagues only for now. If you're referring to those.

[Temidayo_]

@SOLID The biggest things that need fixed are:

1. The number of tries it takes for the system to swallow up players on auction.

2. The sum for which the players are bought. Current sum is usually far below player value.

Fixing these things would make managers far happier than any new feature you may introduce.

Sent from my KFFOWI using Tapatalk

[goldsilvy]

@SOLID The biggest things that need fixed are:

1. The number of tries it takes for the system to swallow up players on auction.

2. The sum for which the players are bought. Current sum is usually far below player value.

Fixing these things would make managers far happier than any new feature you may introduce.

Sent from my KFFOWI using Tapatalk

What do you mean by player value?

Market value indicated by the game or your perception of the player's true value?