Where does that theory come from? Have you every made a poll to see % of ppl agreeing on that? I believe you simply judge by seeing many ppl complaining the same thing. But you may forget that upset ppl tend to raise their voice while others don't. I also believe that the game engine works by probability. And by probability, you can win any game or lose any game. It's just that you need to look at the result at the totality to judge whether it's reasonable enough. Unless Nordeous dev are idiots, all the results are pre-determined without by probability. But by judging the popularity of the game, I believe that their dev shouldn't be that stupid.
WOW. you are new, so do some reading. I dont make this **** up. I have seen results, I have read posts from others who have produced results and there was a ton of people in the old forum who said the same things, but we are unlucky as we cannot see the old forum anymore.
And yes, the devs are that stupid. Look at the glaring game engine bugs and issues. I can hire one person immediately that can come in and program this properly in a heartbeat. That is because I am in the industry. (And no, I am not the professional programmer, so I cant code this site in its entirety, but i can read and edit it if I had to.)
And you are correct by saying it works by probability, and you can win any game or lose any game. but the simulator takes all the numbers and formations into account and simulates the result. This is so easy.
People keeps saying to me to quit if I dont like the game, but I do like the game. I just dont like how it is being run. I just dont like that Nordeus is flippant about the errors and solutions.
But I play the game and I am good at the game. People in this forum, no matter who they are, have always been helpful and i will always give advice where I can. So dont hate me for what I say, because I am trying to make this game better for all.
Never hate you for what you said mate. It's just my opinion on the game and nothing is personal. And by what you said in ur last 2 paragraphs, I know you love the game and you are helpful. I just not agreed with you earlier when you said "the game's result was already determined". Btw you are right that I am new to this game and this forum :-)
If your opponent was playing "both flanks" then keeping the DC or not would have effected the engine not nearly much. But point remains that against a hugely through middle mentality team playing with 1 DC vs 2 STs, and 2 MC vs 3 MC puts you on the wrong formation choiche part.
Must be said that if you were stronger than the opponent to begin with then you prolly would have taken back the lead anyways.
@ Mister Q Of course not. But people said it was wrong to play DL-DC-DR and that's the reason he lost the final. All i wanted to say is, formation dont matter unless you use an illegal one.
I Take it your not leaving then.
i lost CL facing stronger side .. although i dominated him with 60% possession all the match and when tried to make first change .. i was hit by a bug and screen freeze, so never was able to bring my super subs facing his tired defenders and lost in penalties .. i was not able to pick my penalty shooter bcz couldn't amend anything in formation/tactic
yet life goes on
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
Hope you don't leave. Hard to tell about the quality difference, really. it looks like a solid 30% advantage, but you can't tell from stars alone. I have a 38 rated MC who I use as an attacker and his attack/physical skills are both 45+ - so he's a 4* with 6* ability as an attacking midfielder. Most of my defensive players are 8-10 points above their star level in defense/physical. So the stars can lie. And yeah, 3 wide defenders is an open door, in my opinion.
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~