[Official] The King of Kings Challenge - FULL TIME!

[Tactician]

If the registration was in auto I would agree with you but joining the event show at least some minimum activity.
I can agree that a table with 10 teams of 40% q looks silly (and rather tricky ) as an active team can build a a squad of 80% quality to play seriously the game.
So I would say a q difference of 5% looks fair (ok max 10%) to make the contest interest.
Actually to be like associations. Close qualities.

I 'm playing the contest with four teams. I 'm waiting the end of day to show you the tables where 60-70% of the teams didn't play a single game.
Is this fun ?

Ah, maybe now I get it. You expected more teams to be active given that it was not an auto registration competition. On my side here, 6 played at least one match; not as poor as on your side. Also, one of the manager of the weakest teams been challenging others including my team. He even strenghten his team it seems. I think it is a matter of availability, priority and also the rewards are not motivating.

[NUNO FC]

Ah, maybe now I get it. You expected more teams to be active given that it was not an auto registration competition. On my side here, 6 played at least one match; not as poor as on your side. Also, one of the manager of the weakest teams been challenging others including my team. He even strenghten his team it seems. I think it is a matter of availability, priority and also the rewards are not motivating.

I agree with you rewards don't motivate the players and they also don't think long term (undertanding that even if loosing you can win rest and morale packs)

[nikolgiorgos]

Ah, maybe now I get it. You expected more teams to be active given that it was not an auto registration competition. On my side here, 6 played at least one match; not as poor as on your side. Also, one of the manager of the weakest teams been challenging others including my team. He even strenghten his team it seems. I think it is a matter of availability, priority and also the rewards are not motivating.

yes, I 'm disappointed because the concept is a good idea.
Right now NIK has 8 trophies, the 2nd has 2 and the 3rd 0.
Just waiting to finish phase 1.
No fun, no challenge, no thrills.
It could have been much better than this.

[Tactician]

yes, I 'm disappointed because the concept is a good idea.
Right now NIK has 8 trophies, the 2nd has 2 and the 3rd 0.
Just waiting to finish phase 1.
No fun, no challenge, no thrills.
It could have been much better than this.

In my group, they are active, and if I slept or settled with a few cups only, they could have overtaken my team in the ranking.

[Reece p FC]

yes, I 'm disappointed because the concept is a good idea.
Right now NIK has 8 trophies, the 2nd has 2 and the 3rd 0.
Just waiting to finish phase 1.
No fun, no challenge, no thrills.
It could have been much better than this.

both my teams won 9 out of 9 games on both days(i was highest rated team in both but not by miles), day 2 i didnt recieve 1 challenge on either, on 1 acount there were a couple of others active enough to win about 5 trophies, and a couple more won 2 each on day 1, neither of those bothered on day, 2 on my other account the other 9 were barely active at all and 5 or 6 not at all, just a shame there werent more on offer seeing as i topped the thing for once