Page 72 of 91 FirstFirst ... 2262707172737482 ... LastLast
Results 711 to 720 of 915
Like Tree237Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations v2.0 - Which formation to use?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by svens0n View Post
    Hi guys,

    For my cup game I'm up against a team which is 17% better than mine.
    He plays 4(DL, DC, DC, DR) - 1(DMC) - 3(ML, MC, MR) - 2(ST)
    4-1-3W-2

    Is the classic 4-4-2 still the best option to have a chance?
    Any tips on passing, aggression, mentality,..?

    Thanks in advance!
    Sorry there weren't tips and suggestions for you. What did you use? How did it go?
    It wasn't our day.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    26
    Aren't there any tactics for countering a 3-1-2-3-1 formation? Basically a 3-4-3 with a narrow diamond in midfield.
    Nicholaskorley likes this.

  3. #3
    Rookie Justin Cheong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    99
    may i know how look like ...? is 3n,1dmc,2mc,3w,1 or ..?

  4. #4
    Dreamer Barry Brinkhuijsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Lelystad, The Netherlands
    Posts
    344
    This thread is very usefull, but still missing the tactics. (Arrows, mentality etcetc)
    Maybe the first post needs an update?
    WZAWZDB!

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    26
    I don't know these codes, but hope this picture can help you illustrate it (how redundant):

  6. #6
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    Lukahlyo, this is a variation of aggressive V-style (3N-1-2-2W-2), so ND is probably not a good idea, you are losing midfield and flanks. I'd go for 3N-2W-something. 3N-2W-2-1-2 or 3N-2W-2-2W-1, for example. Normal of Defence mentality, counter-attacks.
    Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
    It wasn't our day.

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Toxcatl View Post
    a variation of aggressive V-style (3N-1-2-2W-2), so ND is probably not a good idea, you are losing midfield and flanks. I'd go for 3N-2W-something. 3N-2W-2-1-2 or 3N-2W-2-2W-1
    Uh... come again? Sorry, haha.

  8. #8
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukahlyo View Post
    Uh... come again? Sorry, haha.
    What part you did not understand? W -- wide, N -- narrow. On your picture formation is 3w-1-2-3w-1. Cachai?
    Did you read the first post of this thread?
    Last edited by Toxcatl; 12-05-2016 at 07:35 AM.
    It wasn't our day.

  9. #9
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    43
    Anyone come across a 3n-2w(dml/dmr)-1-1-3? I'm going to try 4-2-2-2 (hexagon). Or should I try 3n-5-2 v style?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1
    Against a formation like this
    GK
    DR DC DC DL
    DMC DMC
    MR ML
    AMC
    ST

    How to counter? I currently play 4-1-2-2-1
    Guy is 8% stronger than me, instructions?
    Last edited by Swathe; 12-08-2016 at 08:28 PM.

Page 72 of 91 FirstFirst ... 2262707172737482 ... LastLast