First of all I want to thank you nikol for all the commitment and effort you've put into this.

I'm new to the game and a lot of what's explained here makes sense. I believe the market value of a player must indeed play a role in its potential.
But there's is something that has been bothering me about the ratio discussion (or TR factor as you've said on the 1st post you made back then).

A 5* star player who has a value of 50M is obviously going to be better than a 5* star 49M player.
But why on earth would a player with 50M value / 1M wage be better than a 50M/ 1.2M wage player?