View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 25 of 44 FirstFirst ... 15232425262735 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #241
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by D3thf0rge13 View Post
    So if my opponent has a defender on position of GK, striker on position of a defender, DMC in midfield and MC on striker position he'll have normal ball possession?
    Are u reading the post. First page it tell you. Or are u trolling us?

  2. #242
    Famous nsretkovic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    1,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Lê Anh Minh View Post
    1 of my friend uses this formation and got 20% ball possesion. It meets ALL requirements. I don't know why it's illegal.

    ---ST ST ST---

    ----MC MC-----

    DL DC DC DC DR
    ------GK-------
    Because you need to have 3 M (Mc, aMc, aMl, aMr etc...) players in the formation

  3. #243
    Champion fadhul17's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    East java, Indonesia.
    Posts
    2,302
    @Lê Anh Minh, like what nsretkovic said. It'll be legal formation if remove ur 1DC to DMC. #advice
    YOU're MANAGER, YOU MANAGE


    Congratulation Arsenal!!
    Hope these thread could help you, Formation-Tactic and GUIDE

  4. #244
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by fadhul17 View Post
    @Lê Anh Minh, like what nsretkovic said. It'll be legal formation if remove ur 1DC to DMC. #advice
    Or a ST to AMC or MC

  5. #245
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Juan Fernandez View Post
    Are u reading the post. First page it tell you. Or are u trolling us?
    Nope.
    Thing is I don't get how an illegal formation may hold up 1:1 score with 20% possession.

  6. #246
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    22
    i have a question

    i just look up in my friends league and the team that finnish first play like this
    dc dc dc
    mc mc mc
    amc
    st st st
    isnt illegal?? he dosent have any players on the side
    and still he took the champions

  7. #247
    Rookie werewolf122's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    140
    Yes, it was illegal due to no players on the flanks.

    On how he won the league, a more likely answer is he just changed to illegal formation towards the end of the season. Even if he played with illegal formation through out the season, he could still win the league. Illegal formation only results in 20% possession and many ppl on the forum had experienced losing to an illegal formation.
    League Winner (5): 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9
    League Runner-up: 6
    CL Winner (5): 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9
    CL Runner-up: 7
    Cup Winner (3): 1, 2, 6
    Cup Runner-up: 3
    Double Winner: 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9

  8. #248
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    213
    So even if u play an ilegal formation u can win. I wish this woulda happen to me last CL. When i play that same formation and tied.
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-imageuploadedbytapatalk1375026693.304457.jpg

  9. #249
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by D3thf0rge13 View Post
    Nope.
    Thing is I don't get how an illegal formation may hold up 1:1 score with 20% possession.
    I seen that. It can happen.

  10. #250
    Dreamer meis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by nsretkovic View Post
    Because you need to have 3 M (Mc, aMc, aMl, aMr etc...) players in the formation
    Ditto

    5-2-1-2 is legal fyi

Page 25 of 44 FirstFirst ... 15232425262735 ... LastLast