46Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Razz 
4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeperOriginally Posted by Confuzzled
Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper
Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
Last edited by Flinger; 07-22-2013 at 04:07 PM.
Presumably the red cards occurred during the match.4-3-4 is illegal simply cause there's no goal keeper
Even if the MR was suspended, shouldn't he be automatically replaced? And in case there was no possible substitute, shouldn't he loose the match 3-0 ?
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
is this an ilegal formation?
-------ST---ST------
-----------------AMR
-------MC---MC-----
DML-----DMC--------
----DC---DC----DC--
seems legit to me
That's fine.
3 defenders, a player on each flanks and a striker, that's okay!
๑๐
ทรงพระเจริญ
AEPRE FC
Does this formations are illegal 3-3-1-3-----4-3-3?
So Illegal formation is when more than 2 players are not on their positions?
Strange that this illegal formation is able to hold up...
No. Please re-read the first post in this thread.
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
So if my opponent has a defender on position of GK, striker on position of a defender, DMC in midfield and MC on striker position he'll have normal ball possession?
Are u reading the post. First page it tell you. Or are u trolling us?
Reply With Quote