View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    42
    At the top of this thread however it is discussed that you should have a minimum of 3 defenders etc. I cannot see how having only 2 defenders is "illegal" or against the rules of the game. Like I say football is an evolving game and surely people should be given a freedom to play whatever formation they wish. For example on the game you cannot have 4 out and out forwards yet there is a formation in real life football 4-2-4. Whilst I concede this is not football manager etc. surely managers should be given the freedom to create new formations to trouble opponents? for example if I wanted to play a 2-5-3 formation.

  2. #2
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by scale89 View Post
    At the top of this thread however it is discussed that you should have a minimum of 3 defenders etc. I cannot see how having only 2 defenders is "illegal" or against the rules of the game. Like I say football is an evolving game and surely people should be given a freedom to play whatever formation they wish. For example on the game you cannot have 4 out and out forwards yet there is a formation in real life football 4-2-4. Whilst I concede this is not football manager etc. surely managers should be given the freedom to create new formations to trouble opponents? for example if I wanted to play a 2-5-3 formation.

    you are joking, right?>
    4-2-4 is a 2 striker formation with 2 wingers, wingers are considered forwards in spain italy and south america, while in english speaking countries they are considered part of midfield
    Solo on Android - No friends, no manipulations, no scout players , minimal spending

    4 time League Winner
    3 time Cup winner

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapyer View Post
    you are joking, right?>
    4-2-4 is a 2 striker formation with 2 wingers, wingers are considered forwards in spain italy and south america, while in english speaking countries they are considered part of midfield
    No 4-2-4 is not two wingers! they are wing FORWARDS! different positions in that the wing forwards are more attacking than wingers. for players to be considered "Forwards" they don't have to be Centre forwards, they are different positions within a band such as forwards, defenders. For example in the Centre back position there are normal CB's then there are sweepers who don't necessarily have to be set up behind CB's. similarly in the forward positions there are different types of forwards Target man, wing forwards, second strikers, poachers etc. a wing forward differs to a winger!

  4. #4
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by scale89 View Post
    No 4-2-4 is not two wingers! they are wing FORWARDS! different positions in that the wing forwards are more attacking than wingers. for players to be considered "Forwards" they don't have to be Centre forwards, they are different positions within a band such as forwards, defenders. For example in the Centre back position there are normal CB's then there are sweepers who don't necessarily have to be set up behind CB's. similarly in the forward positions there are different types of forwards Target man, wing forwards, second strikers, poachers etc. a wing forward differs to a winger!

    just wow
    Solo on Android - No friends, no manipulations, no scout players , minimal spending

    4 time League Winner
    3 time Cup winner