View Poll Results: Do you see this thread deserve to be sticky?

Voters
304. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, deserve to be sticky.

    278 91.45%
  • No, should be as it is.

    26 8.55%
Page 57 of 194 FirstFirst ... 747555657585967107157 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 570 of 1997
Like Tree159Likes

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: How to Win Against Any Formation?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    Like this?


    Need a big win here, league title could go down to goal difference!


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  2. #2
    Apprentice Smoggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Smoggieland
    Posts
    289
    Need something to beat a 3-2-2-2 of
    DL-DC-DC-DR
    MC-MC
    AML- AMR
    ST- ST.
    Thanks

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cairo - Egypt
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by Smoggie View Post
    Need something to beat a 3-2-2-2 of
    DL-DC-DC-DR
    MC-MC
    AML- AMR
    ST- ST.
    Thanks
    as mentioned at 1st page
    4-2-2-2

    DL--DC-DC--DR
    ----MC-MC----
    AML--------AMR
    ------ST--ST----
    Some people however may change the MC-MC to a DMC-DMC, don't worry too much about this as it will not effect the formations provided and would enhance your ball possession.

    Effective formation to counter the 4-2-2-2 would be the 3-2-2-2-1:
    Tested in great match and it work well.

    -----------ST----------
    AML-------------AMR
    --------MC-MC-----
    DML------------DMR
    -----DC-DC-DC-----

    Flat Formation, but possible add down arrows on DML and DMR to boost defence if required.
    Short or mixed passing, down both flanks, with fast defenders use offside trap, pressing whole pitch in attacking mentality OR
    normal or defensive mentality, pressing own half with force counter and mixed passing.

    4-5-1V Motivated

    -------------ST-----------
    AML----------------AMR
    -----MC--------MC-------
    --------DMC(UP)--------
    DL(UP)---DC---DC-----DR(UP)

    The 4-5-1V Style Motivated is also another option to use against the 4-2-2-2 formation.

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    9
    Hello all...

    Any ideas to assist me to counter this formation. Opposition is stronger than mine.
    DL DC DC DR
    DMC DMC
    MC
    AMC AMC
    ST

    Thanks

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cairo - Egypt
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by Saintbart View Post
    Hello all...

    Any ideas to assist me to counter this formation. Opposition is stronger than mine.
    DL DC DC DR
    DMC DMC
    MC
    AMC AMC
    ST

    Thanks
    3 2 3 2

    DC-DC-DC
    DML-DMR
    MC-MC-MC
    ST-ST

    defensive mentality ... own half ... long passing ... down both flanks ... counter attack ... no offside trap.

  6. #6
    Rookie Jad Assaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    102
    Hey man,
    What about this formation in the field: 3-2-3-2
    --ST-ST--
    -MR-MC-ML
    -DMC-DMC-
    -DR-DC-DL-
    I Think this formation do use the hole pitch with the wings. And you could replace the MC with an AMC.
    Do you think its a good formation?

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cairo - Egypt
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by Jad Assaf View Post
    Hey man,
    What about this formation in the field: 3-2-3-2
    --ST-ST--
    -MR-MC-ML
    -DMC-DMC-
    -DR-DC-DL-
    I Think this formation do use the hole pitch with the wings. And you could replace the MC with an AMC.
    Do you think its a good formation?
    It's good and you can replace the MC with an AMC ... try the 2 formation and see which will be better with your players .. but the 2 are good

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    5
    I have 2 upcoming matches against 2 formations I have never played against before.

    No 1:
    DL---DC---DR
    -----DMC------
    --MC-MC-MC--
    --ST-ST-ST---

    No 2:
    DL---DC---DR
    -----DMC-----
    ML-MC-MC-MR
    ----ST--ST----

    Both teams quality are about the same as mine, but I am playing away.
    Appreciate any advice! Thanks!

  9. #9
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    Hello Adel Gamal

    Yesterday you said to me that 4-3-2-1 isn't a good formation to play regularly, why? I never lost with it


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cairo - Egypt
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by dv8r View Post
    Hello Adel Gamal

    Yesterday you said to me that 4-3-2-1 isn't a good formation to play regularly, why? I never lost with it
    I only meant don't use it against 3-2-3-2 ever not don't play with it at any time

    this formation can't hold/stand against 3 2 3 2 it's a risk.