Results 1 to 10 of 68
Like Tree47Likes

Thread: There should be relegation of teams

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    4am
    4am is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    And why should i be in an hurry?
    No reason at all. It's your game, you play it how you wish.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    And, of course , six years later you would have your players 6 years older, but if you don't tank, they would be older too and 1 star.
    You'd also have considerably greater spending power with which to replace those players.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    For a lonely player, all that matters are the tittles.
    Not for me ... and I don't play with anyone else either. But that's one of the game's best features - it allows you to play your game, your way.

    Quote Originally Posted by Raykco View Post
    If relegation was brought in, how would it work? In a league of 14 teams, with the top 7 going up, and the bottom 2 going down, that would leave just 5 teams. With 7 coming up to join them, who would fill the other two places, without a major game reconstruction.
    Whatever method you chose to adopt, incorporating relegation would require a major undertaking on the development team's part so I think we can all agree it's unlikely to happen. Interesting to hear the various views, nonetheless.
    Last edited by 4am; 11-08-2013 at 12:13 AM.

  2. #2
    Rookie Flinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by 4am View Post

    You'd also have considerably greater spending power with which to replace those players.
    How so? You may be at a level where you gain more money, but players are also more expensive. Besides, you either spent resources improving your team, meaning you don't have that much left, or you didn't make that good on the competitions you played. With the improved team after 3 years of relegation, you would be able to do well on most competitions (perhaps excluding cup), so you would have gained less for a match, but go further in CL. And you wouldn't have to spend resources on new players because yours would do just fine, so you'd be storing all of them.

    Now let's clear one thing. I don't tank for a living... I tanked last season because i was finding too hard to remain competitive due to token and booster shortage, and my team was loosing quality steadily. So i tanked a season, and have now tokens and booster for playing a few seasons at a good level.

    One more thing. Even if you implement handicaps for the relegated teams, it is far too easy to tank and avoid relegation, so i see no point at it anyway. Like i said i tanked and finished 8th overall. Won many games while controlling not to get promoted.

  3. #3
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    How so? You may be at a level where you gain more money, but players are also more expensive. Besides, you either spent resources improving your team, meaning you don't have that much left, or you didn't make that good on the competitions you played. With the improved team after 3 years of relegation, you would be able to do well on most competitions (perhaps excluding cup), so you would have gained less for a match, but go further in CL. And you wouldn't have to spend resources on new players because yours would do just fine, so you'd be storing all of them.

    Now let's clear one thing. I don't tank for a living... I tanked last season because i was finding too hard to remain competitive due to token and booster shortage, and my team was loosing quality steadily. So i tanked a season, and have now tokens and booster for playing a few seasons at a good level.

    One more thing. Even if you implement handicaps for the relegated teams, it is far too easy to tank and avoid relegation, so i see no point at it anyway. Like i said i tanked and finished 8th overall. Won many games while controlling not to get promoted.
    Relegation is a terrible idea anyway. The people who want a more realistic game are playing the wrong game.
    Raykco likes this.


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  4. #4
    4am
    4am is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Flinger View Post
    How so? You may be at a level where you gain more money, but players are also more expensive.
    Yup; because they're better players.

    (Even though it's all relative, whether you're Level 1 or Level 31).

  5. #5
    Dreamer duchao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    477
    I think should still be relegated, for exciting tournament,
    Du học Đài Loan vừa học vừa làm - Tư vấn Du học Đài Loan chi phí thấp, vừa học vừa làm, hỗ trợ việc làm thêm thu nhập hấp dẫn.

  6. #6
    Champion Saransh Vatsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,814
    Quote Originally Posted by 4am View Post


    Whatever methose to adopt, incorporating relegation would require a major undertaking on the development team's part so I think we can all agree it's unlikely to happen. Interesting to hear the various views, nonetheless.
    That is the main point. All this discusion is useless as it won't be implemented, whether for the good or for tyhe bad. So its kinda pointless.