Nordeus apologists, please explain...

[Siddharth Shanker Singh]

I've got exactly the opposite happening to me.

I'm scared to miss a game, as every one I don't spectate, I seem to lose/draw!

Same here...

[khris]

Really nobody know's how are the hidden abilities proggrammed in players, % by default of effectiveness, in what % affect the morale, in what % affect the low condition, in what % the wrong position, in what % the bonus, in what.... in what a lot of thing's and the "match scenario's" or "types of matches" or, "circumstances" that the game use to do the matches simulations, and bring the matches to one way, maybe, this match your team is more aggressive, maybe, you win 1-0 and the other have 5 yellow cards, nobody know really that.

That's why I try to play that trying to understand how is programmed this thing...

this thing...
:'D

[Skidz]

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! SOMEWHERE!...Nordeus should rename themselves the X FILES!.

[René Steegs]

Don't you think if they would reveal the secret, that it would take away the entire aspect of the game called managing?
If they would let everyone in on their secret, we're not managing anything, but we're copying.
Wouldn't that be boring, everyone using the same strategy?
I like it, everyone is different, everyone thinks different, everyone manages different. that's the fun of a game like this!

[Scout Gorski]

Don't you think if they would reveal the secret, that it would take away the entire aspect of the game called managing?
If they would let everyone in on their secret, we're not managing anything, but we're copying.
Wouldn't that be boring, everyone using the same strategy?
I like it, everyone is different, everyone thinks different, everyone manages different. that's the fun of a game like this!

No, I don't like that idea at all. Although it's an interesting philosophy and I would not be devastated if that was Nordeus' reasoning for the secrecy.

However, the problem in my scenario is that it seems that doing nothing trumps doing something to achieve victories. That's not fun at all.

[Anthony Duncan]

Had some strange results recently but hey its football and the proverbial doodoo happens look at the chelsea result today.

On a brighter note i have been tanking this season and decided to test my team and put them out to win against the top of my league and well 4-1 win ohhh im now 6th grrrr

[Spyros]

There are no secrets involved guys, only sloppy game engine. If there was a proper method, they would be proud to announce it I am afraid

[rastaman70]

I manage four teams.

I have been focusing a lot of attention on two teams. I train players, buy players off the transfer market, attend games, pay a lot of attention on in-game strategy, etc. etc.

The other two teams I just make sure all players in the line up are healthy and eligible. I do not attend games, I do not change game strategy. I do not train, and so on...

The two teams I focus a lot of time on are both out of the Champions League and Cups. The teams I don't pay attention to are both in the Semis of both Champions and Cup.

So......how is that possible? When is Nordeus going to explain what factors affect game outcome?

This supports everything I have been saying, that you dont really manage anything that matters. Also it just re-enforces what I have been saying that watching the games does NOT give you an advantage. the only advantage you get from watching the game is that you can remove a yellow carded player so they dont get a red, AND you get green booster.

I have almost stopped watching all my games and dont give bonuses and am winning all my games easily.

LOL, I would like to see Spyros explain this one! OOPS! I just read down the page and noticed he put in his opinion already, which actually makes sense! perhaps there is an ounce of rationality left in ole spyros.

[Spyros]

I believe in bad rng. Stats are thrown constantly in a match bucket, being steered up and sometimes bad, unreasonable results come out.



PS: Rastaman I wont even bother to comment on what you wrote. You see you are the one who tries to prove conspiracy theories, not me. So reply all you like, since you love to get that last word.

[rastaman70]

I believe in bad rng. Stats are thrown constantly in a match bucket, being steered up and sometimes bad, unreasonable results come out.



PS: Rastaman I wont even bother to comment on what you wrote. You see you are the one who tries to prove conspiracy theories, not me. So reply all you like, since you love to get that last word.

Not looking for your comment, as I just told you how it was.

you are correct in that stats are thrown in a bag and a hand basically comes in and grabs a result based on the numbers. it really cant be any other way based on how this game is structured.

the problem is that the more people who know this, it gets worse for Nordeus simply because it takes away the manager aspect from the football management game.

look, this is a football management game and it is masquerading as a serious football management game, but in reality is just mickey mouse.

I play this game to see what it takes to manipulate it properly, to see what drives this engine to give such inconsistent results.

You guys call it conspiracies, but really, I would put money on most of them being correct. why? because its too simple of a game. Its a simple game out to get money. as much money as it can. how else can I put this...

Its a carnival game posing as a football manager. we all know that carnival games are rigged. that is a fact.

I just cant believe people play this game and put serious money in it and they dont even get a prize to take home.