Quote Originally Posted by Sully View Post
stop saying it works for most formations. easy. because I have used man2man and it works for most formations too. Like the guy previous said, when you are better, it makes more logical sense to use man2man, while when you are inferior, it makes more sense to use zonal, and thats just pure logic and common sense.

instead of getting your panties in a bunch and getting warned for insults, you could have easily corrected this by typing in what I typed in. I know what you wrote as I have cut and paste it several times and it reads the same way every time I read it, so no sense denying it sounds like I said, because at least one other person agreed that it sounds like I suggested.

so to recap what everyone else but you were saying: the consensus is to use man2man when you have better players, and zonal when you the other team is better.

Wow, a much better way to say it, dont you think?
Can't you just let it go? He's apologised already. He could have phrased it better and you could stop reading so much into a harmless remark made about a game. I've seen Skidz offer lots of help to lots of people on this forum. But it will all be opinion, as is every piece of advice given on here. There is little or no hard data/conclusive facts.

Besides, there is no evidence to suggest that either is better as it's all conjecture. Maybe we should start a poll?

I prefer MoM. It works for most formations.