Why AMC/R/L score more than strikers?

[jarharnamme]

STs recently started to work as they should. Some of them are assistant players while others are the scorers.

.

That's lower level hence you think ST is good but having an AML&AMR is way better in Top11, the most I can get from ST is 1goal per game but the AML&AMR will score 2goal per game in the same squad, oh ST also looks good against inferior teams in lower quality league

For example nor in liverpool nor in manchester city strikers werent those who scored a lot, wingers did the job and they both played mostly 4-3-3 (something like 4-5-1v here).
When you use formations without aml/amr, than your strikers(s) become scorers as it should be.

Yup, but back then in 2010-2015 when this game and thread start(2015) people already have this question why AML&AMR is fukin OP in Top11? Guess Nodeus is way ahead of time in football meta tactic

Ah also yes someone did say bout live animation. Back then you hardly score from crosses & ST heads in.
These days we can see some goals from crosses which is a plus!
It takes years for Nodeus to finally make that headed score goal live animation frequently for ST to score from crosses.
Back then you can only do that in a friendly against 1% or 1* because for whatever reason the ST can't beat the DC in 1on1 aerial duels.

Oh, and if you want ST to score more, better to have ML&MR compared to AML&AMR in your squad.
Because ML&MR crosses & passes more while AML&AMR does Robben more, cuts in & shoot from long range and score, (hence why people like to put Shadow Striker ability on their AM)