re: player contracts

[craigyc13]

[QUOTE=nikolgiorgos;433626]huh ?
what's this has to do with this subject
This has to do from how inform is a manager, how deeper he 's gong in the game, how much reading he did (or exchanging info/opinions with other managers), the perception, the experience he gets through time.
For example I can tell you that your player (who is 26 y.o.) is a slow trainer so (unless you 'll spend a fortune of greens) next season he 'll be a 3* player so he won't be anymore effective vs 5*-6* defenders and GK.
So it's wrong to renew (and before expiring) the contract of an "old" player.

Nik..I find it astonishing that someone like you can be calling my player a slow trainer. He is in his 5th season with me and he is at 76℅. I originally bought him in the low 90s and I am not the type that uses up greens on individual players. He trains with the team 4 times a day as recommended by the game, and rest packs are applied to players who need them when matches are close. Based on the fact that this game reduces your players by 20℅ every season, a regular trainer would have been a 2 star player or less by now if I kept him so long. So if he is not a fast trainer, I will probably never see one.

As it relates to my comment about Nordeus. I arrived at that conclusion because it defies logic. One would think that that if a contract is for 3 years, and you are given the option to renew, you would have gotten another three years. But from a business perspective the developers decided that there needs to be a trade-off if you decide to renew a contract instead of investing tokens on a new player off the market. This is my way of justifying why you get one year less on the contract for renewing.


Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk