Association turnaments getting boring ?

[gamer5289]

Nice post Nik.
I totally echo your sentiment that playing association has become a bit boring over the past 2 seasons.
However, placing limit on players quality is not something that sounds good.
Getting players to 7 stars is not too difficult with right training and if you stop progress after that, it defeats the purpose of power training someone.

I agree with the proposal of loans, but in a different way.
A suggestion would be to limit the loans per team to 5, but you can only loan 1 player from any team.
SO if there is a strong 9 star team with 5 weaker teams, each of the weaker teams can get only 1 strong player from the 9 star team.
This would go a long way in evening out the playing field for the matchups.

As far as the association draws are concerned, I believe the Nordeus philosophy is to draw all teams around same star level and association division.
Facing teams in same association level is understandable, since both of you are competing for the same next level.
If a GOLD1 team faces a Bronze1 team, it might not be fair since 1 is competing for Platinum and 1 for Silver3.
However, what annoys me is the fact that a 6 star association in GOLD1 does not get a chance at a 5 star association in GOLD1.
If the 2 associations are competing for the same next division, they should compete against each other to get there.

[nikolgiorgos]

Nice post Nik.
I totally echo your sentiment that playing association has become a bit boring over the past 2 seasons.
However, placing limit on players quality is not something that sounds good.
Getting players to 7 stars is not too difficult with right training and if you stop progress after that, it defeats the purpose of power training someone.

I agree with the proposal of loans, but in a different way.
A suggestion would be to limit the loans per team to 5, but you can only loan 1 player from any team.
SO if there is a strong 9 star team with 5 weaker teams, each of the weaker teams can get only 1 strong player from the 9 star team.
This would go a long way in evening out the playing field for the matchups.

As far as the association draws are concerned, I believe the Nordeus philosophy is to draw all teams around same star level and association division.
Facing teams in same association level is understandable, since both of you are competing for the same next level.
If a GOLD1 team faces a Bronze1 team, it might not be fair since 1 is competing for Platinum and 1 for Silver3.
However, what annoys me is the fact that a 6 star association in GOLD1 does not get a chance at a 5 star association in GOLD1.
If the 2 associations are competing for the same next division, they should compete against each other to get there.

- yes, to make 7* players isn't much but to build 9*-10* players is something you can't do it with a simple farming and training.
Also I disagree with what mac spotted. At this period 99% of the superb teams of 9*-10* players aren't token buyers.
they are exploiters or managers who stayed some seasons and gathered some thousands greens.

About the division I don't agree with your point because there isn't a specific number of teams there.
If it was for example 1000 positions in Platinum division, then yes, I should play with a platinum group to compete for one of those positions.