Trying to defend realism in Top Eleven is really a sad excuse.
I made the same example in another thread. Football is made of strategy and quality, then condition and morale and then the home effect and bonus. Barcelona can play a bad game against a 4th division team, but in the end quality will prevail, A bad team can surprise a better one with strong defense and counterattack, maybe score thanks to a penalty, but losing in TE is nothing like this. "Live" simulation doesn't show this kind of play, nor the stats speak this way. Even if you have a 7-8* star team (like I do now), with every SA you will never nail a single **** in the game, not a corner, not a free kick, not a shot on target out of the 10-15 I do in the game, while the opponent makes 1 goal out of 1 shot, or 3 out of 3. Maybe this even comes from an abandoned team. For the sake of realism, a team that doesn't train will never, EVER beat Barcelona even out of pure luck, because there are more factors that influence a match.
All I want to ****ing know by now (even after another defeat in FA with perfect starting condition and bonus), is what plays a role after quality, condition and bonus after all of those have been perfect against a team that (at best) is on par with strategy, condition and bonus, except quality, so quality should prevail.
Transparency is all I'm asking.