All these scores show that I was quite right when I said that when we don't attend the simulation becomes more stable and don't raises variability in the scenarios, covering/ doing a high distance AvQ guarantee ...

So I bet that this maybe, could cover 2/3 of the distance inside the beatability margin... (the "stability" inside a scenario where u aren't attending"..

so, let's say, time ago 30% was the margin... and a abandoned team could overcome us, staying inside -20%....
So now, the formula should be, 60% margin beatability, so, if manager don't attend till a 40% should be covered for the one that don't attend..

and "covered" in terms of scenario too should be defined... as it isn't "implacable" but as the margin is wider than before the effect changes in our perception...

PS:
I mean, all is proportional, and the "don't raises variability in the scenarios" is for the non active/attending team who have a % of security at certain scenarios....