Do you like the idea of skipping Levels ?

[nikolgiorgos]

USARABAT
I don't know if I get the "spirit" of your thread but want to spot that in higher levels doesn't mean that there are better or more active teams.
My reserves in a different server, have many friends, old players of the game (levels 45-50 and above).
Most of them now are boring and don't care or play their seasons in auto.

Good active teams can be in every level.
I remember I made this suggestion in an old thread

#26
https://forum.topeleven.com/tutorial...-system-3.html

Of course that needs more flexibility in changing servers.

[USARABAT]

USARABAT
I don't know if I get the "spirit" of your thread but want to spot that in higher levels doesn't mean that there are better or more active teams.
My reserves in a different server, have many friends, old players of the game (levels 45-50 and above).
Most of them now are boring and don't care or play their seasons in auto.

I know that man , i have many close friends at higher leagues and top server ...
That's why I suggested the idea of DEGRADING in parallel with skipping levels (go down one level at least ) teams who don't train enough their team/ buy better players / below 8th position / or abandoned their team.

Here's a new suggestion: Degrading teams who don't watch 15 games out 26 in their league.

This is the only way you reward active and ambition managers and punish reckless / careless ones ...

No body has yet answered my question : why does a team who is abandoned by his manager stays in league 56 for example for 3 months and then the system replace his old players and stays in same level longer, while many active / ambitious/ skilled/ or maybe rich managers are ready to take his place ?