Do you like the idea of skipping Levels ?

[nikolgiorgos]

That's why I suggested the idea of DEGRADING in parallel with skipping levels (go down one level at least ) teams who don't train enough their team/ buy better players / below 8th position / or abandoned their team.

- That's a very bad suggestion.
Remember all those pro tanking teams (mostly the Turks and others) in top100.
They will end at LV1 with all the benefits (stadium, sources, experience ...)

No body has yet answered my question : why does a team who is abandoned by his manager stays in league 56 for example for 3 months and then the system replace his old players and stays in same level longer, while many active / ambitious/ skilled/ or maybe rich managers are ready to take his place ?

LV56 it's time you 're playing the game and where are you know.
Doesn't mean that a Championship of LV56 is better than a championship of LV26.
Or a manager of LV56 is better than a manager of LV56.
When I was here in the forum as LV12 manager, with 10 months experience in the forum, I was giving advice or info to managers from levels 20 or 30.

[USARABAT]

- That's a very bad suggestion.
Remember all those pro tanking teams (mostly the Turks and others) in top100.
They will end at LV1 with all the benefits (stadium, sources, experience ...)

Kindly explain in detail why is it bad ?

I imagine it as following: If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80% and if this manager didn't improve his team ( didn't watch / train/ buy players) will go down one more and his players will be 60 % and so on .... until he returns to level 1 with 1% power players ... that's how I imagine it ... so how do u see that they can abuse this idea ?

[Toxcatl]

If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80%

C'mon, you can't be that ignorant.

[USARABAT]

Answer instead of acting like a cloon

I have posed some good questions in my main topic and some of my comments but yet no body have answered them yet. I colored them in red now , maybe you will pay more attention.

[khris]

Answer instead of acting like a cloon

I have posed some good questions in my main topic and some of my comments but yet no body have answered them yet. I colored them in red now , maybe you will pay more attention.

justb to point,

"If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80%"

100% wins level =80%
100% loses level = becomes a 120%

The "internal skills" that works in levels of 5 still been the same as in the old versions... as said, the only way to have a relegation zone in conditions, (knowing that the game will not touch the "base" of the players doing a substraction of skills, is auto sell the +5* players... then you are relegated with the 5* as 6*... fair.

[nikolgiorgos]

oh, so it's about tanking again ?
I had 2-3 ideas/ suggestions, more simple than this mess - lol

[KenoticFC]

This is my solution for tanking, but Nordeus does not listen.

[HairDryer]

Lol! all you need is ranking system like Association to know where you place at your level. Seriously is not about higher or lower level.
Instead of going to higher level why not choose a League. Pro League, Semi Pro and Ameture. Like Asso concept Plarinium Gold and Silver.

Sent from my SM-A800F using Tapatalk

[pcmacdaniel]

If someone's takes entire team to 160%, that'll cost roughly $400 US Dollars, under OP proposal the reward for that is to promote 3 or 4 levels. I don't think I've ever seen any idea that is less friendly to our friends that make the game free for the rest of us than this.

If nordeus implements relegation, I will quit the game.