Quote Originally Posted by IImaestroII View Post
So you are saying that is like a "give it all you have got " option? i have played some matches switching between mtm and zonal and sometimes is better sometimes is worse. From my experience against equal/ stronger teams i played zonal , beacause with rigid man marking if oppo strikers are faster or good dribblers they will beat your defenders, the only way ( or the only weapon is the offside trap ). I use some times MtM against small teams in other to reduce their chances (that are already low due to quality difference ) so to prevent possible troll matches
" i played zonal , beacause with rigid man marking if oppo strikers are faster or good dribblers they will beat your defenders,"

This is a theory, affected for the visual perception -of course players move different in the live animations switching orders as, switching passing options- but here "if I can confirm that these 2 options, are associated to the 2 bonuses" it is not the same, cause the scenario can make work better long passing or short, but in "all cases despite the visual effect, players should work slightly better, pressing hard, and with the MtM.....

without anydoubt, and despite the "visual effect" that makes one think in the logical behavior of the players, right? cause as you say, zonal should move the line more equally... "in theory" but in this case, as it was set, it is the same to have this theory, or the theory that, as visually a 7* ST is better than a 5*, and this is not true, we know very well that a 5* can score 40 goals and the 7* can act like invisible man the 50% of the season...

and thats the same, "seems logic" to say that, "zonal keeps more players in a zone" and "in theory, they should keep the line to provoke offsides easily true? but IMO, nope. This game don't goes too far away and isn't too much detalied in a "minimalistic way" to make this little option impact in big scale...


The only thing that can occur, is that if both options do not use more condition than zonal and low pressure, than, yes, then should exist a "signal" that means we need to use these options, as when u use long/mixed passing and u lose the bal 3 consecutive times.... then is when the game want u switching to short passing...

Really, it needs a deep analysis .. and some confirmation cause if the options are linked to consition usage, "always" will mean that, theres a benefit behind this, depsite the visual stuffs we can see... thats an illusion man... just an illusion xD