Can someone give my time back?

[milpol]

Excuses? Hahaha. You just don't want to hear any other opinion. Your fault, we don't care anymore. We tried to explain you but u don't want to hear.



Bye bye

Top Eleven YouTube channel:Miltiadis K

[HeavensAAA]

Excuses? Hahaha. You just don't want to hear any other opinion. Your fault, we don't care anymore. We tried to explain you but u don't want to hear.



Bye bye

Top Eleven YouTube channel:Miltiadis K

Milpol, you tried your best and appreciate it.

@SuperDunk As I have said before, we need to have good subs on the bench to turn games around when certain players are not on form. If you need examples in reality, just think about how many world cups Messi has won and then compare with the number of goals he scored in La Liga and CL. 1 or 2 world-class player can win you lots of matches but not all trophies. You cannot rely on your first-11 to win you every single game, or players like Giroud will be out without a job.

And a fully solid backline is the bedrock of victory as well. Imagine if Liverpool is without any of Van Dijk, Matic, Robertson or Arnold. Just missing 1 will make a whole lot of difference. Stats of your defensive players are good, but most are very weak in strength and aggression. It is just a matter of when those weaknesses come to bite, and unfortunately that pops up in the final.

Each game is played on its own and should be prepared accordingly. Playing every game with the exact same formation and players is really asking for trouble, because a fair game engine would have to ‘carry out’ the unlikely possibility according to data spread. Say a 30%+ team should win 95% of the time and the other 5% would have to ‘favour heavily towards the other teams’, then that means you will face 1 of these games out of 20 matches. Whether you could ride out that 5% troll storm or not takes strategy and subs at crucial time. And it is the likeliest this will happen to any supposedly favourite team is in the finals when our opponent is likely to be the strongest we face in 50 games a season.

Your opponent was playing 4-3-3. The most logical counter formation would have been 4-4-2. Outnumber him in both defence and also in midfield, then win by quality by front-2. Should have won the game pretty easily. Sticking 2 DMCs in such games is asking for trouble, because you would have lost the midfield, and then also lost the flanks (opponent playing AMR, MR & DR against your AML & DL - 3v2, and that applies on both flanks). Opponent attacks will not come into the middle, so you were practically playing with 2-men down when defending (if your DMC is pulled to the left side, your right side has no player and space would be exploited by their ML). If you had the 2 DMCs playing MCs instead, you could have won the game by quality most of the time.

You are entitled to not taking any of the honest advice, though I did the homework with trying and testing nearly every formation against opponents. I purposefully play a totally different formation every tie to keep my opponent guessing (they cannot actually guess it because I prepared my team based on their formation and 2 further changes if they change perfectly twice).