Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyEye View Post
laughable game that’s what it is, and the fact that you use every argument possible to defend this game just makes it worse.

Top11 in a nutshell lmao, it deserves 1 star rating

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ED6ABE3D-6DE8-43D7-84E0-FF10768372A1.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	93.0 KB 
ID:	140230
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D8688A59-E300-4909-861F-0382028B8D7D.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	91.0 KB 
ID:	140231
You complain about something Ive commented in the previous post and that Ive already reported by myself -margins, team simplificated as you show with x6 high Q players and 5 low AvQ, so teams with a single 9* GK + 3* defenders and the GK that perform as super GKs etc-, I don't know if you are the same JohnnyEye that was here around 2012 but if you aren't you should learn a bit about how the game progressed these years, and that isn't easy to suggest any alternative in the calibration to make this game work in a more balanced way.

You are basically right and by myself Ive reported all this since time ago as player, because it is a matter of margins.
So, here the point, whats a fair score between the teams you showed? and why? why you expect that score? and, whats your suggestion to fix the scores you are suffering? so to have a more balanced engine, but think that in the end, this can't be a simple complain, it needs to be technically applied, and this is made by calibrating what I'm trying to explain you, parameters.