Results 1 to 10 of 915
Like Tree237Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations v2.0 - Which formation to use?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    Lukahlyo, this is a variation of aggressive V-style (3N-1-2-2W-2), so ND is probably not a good idea, you are losing midfield and flanks. I'd go for 3N-2W-something. 3N-2W-2-1-2 or 3N-2W-2-2W-1, for example. Normal of Defence mentality, counter-attacks.
    Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
    It wasn't our day.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Toxcatl View Post
    a variation of aggressive V-style (3N-1-2-2W-2), so ND is probably not a good idea, you are losing midfield and flanks. I'd go for 3N-2W-something. 3N-2W-2-1-2 or 3N-2W-2-2W-1
    Uh... come again? Sorry, haha.

  3. #3
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukahlyo View Post
    Uh... come again? Sorry, haha.
    What part you did not understand? W -- wide, N -- narrow. On your picture formation is 3w-1-2-3w-1. Cachai?
    Did you read the first post of this thread?
    Last edited by Toxcatl; 12-05-2016 at 07:35 AM.
    It wasn't our day.