How many troll results you had this season ?

[nikolgiorgos]

hmm, that's weird.
Ok, in the Cup sh...t happens but in League ?
Some wrong team chemistry.

[Gobobo]

Nope. As I said I'm using the same tactics and players as last season - no change except maybe one youngster who I've power-trained coming through to replace a veteran.

Oh, and I'm not spending any $$$$ this season.

[khris]

Nope. As I said I'm using the same tactics and players as last season - no change except maybe one youngster who I've power-trained coming through to replace a veteran.

Oh, and I'm not spending any $$$$ this season.

"As I said I'm using the same tactics and players as last season -


no change except maybe one youngster who I've power-trained coming through to replace a veteran. "

So nope, th situation is not the same exactly, a single player can change part of the whole team dynamic. Is a matter of internal roles of contribution/calibration.


I would like to know the difference betwen you and these 2 better teams, and if you use the same 11 just with a new younger.

[Gobobo]

"As I said I'm using the same tactics and players as last season -


no change except maybe one youngster who I've power-trained coming through to replace a veteran. "

So nope, th situation is not the same exactly, a single player can change part of the whole team dynamic. Is a matter of internal roles of contribution/calibration.


I would like to know the difference betwen you and these 2 better teams, and if you use the same 11 just with a new younger.

Funny that I've been playing since February 2016, passing level 30 a few months back, and changing one player (or more than one player) has had very little difference before.

Of course there is one major difference this season; not spending $$$$.

[pleasures]

Funny that I've been playing since February 2016, passing level 30 a few months back, and changing one player (or more than one player) has had very little difference before.

Of course there is one major difference this season; not spending $$$$.

Same as.....this game is broken nobody from Nordeus cares

[Iridensys]

Out of CL against a weaker opponent, me 125%, he 107%.

First round was a troll match, he scored second gol in final minutes.


Second round balanced match, but he was weaker, it was very strange that I haven't not scored, but the problem was the first match.

[vad]

Here are some recent results just from this season.

Exhibit 1 : Me: 115.4%; opponent: 109.7%. Full condition, top morale, all 10% bonuses. Both managers present. Result: loss 0:6.
Exhibit 2: me same as above, opponent: 106.7%. First game: I'm present, he is not - loss 1:3; 2nd game - both present; loss 1:2
Exhibit 3: me same as above, opponent: 83.9%. I'm present, plus one supporter; he is not.1:1.
Exhibit 4: me same as above, opponent 95.9%, not present. 1:1.
Exhibit 5: me same as above, opponent 106.2, not present. Loss 1:3
Exhibit 6: opponent 99.4%, not present. 1:1.

After about 5 years with this game, I can surely say that it's much closer to slot machine than most people think, and all these formations, sideline orders, condition, morale, etc etc, have only entertainment value.

(The quality percentages of the teams are what T11 shows as of today, it apparently does not capture them at the time of the game and in all history games shows today's values; but it's safe to assume that the gaps were comparable)

[pleasures]

Here are some recent results just from this season.

Exhibit 1 : Me: 115.4%; opponent: 109.7%. Full condition, top morale, all 10% bonuses. Both managers present. Result: loss 0:6.
Exhibit 2: me same as above, opponent: 106.7%. First game: I'm present, he is not - loss 1:3; 2nd game - both present; loss 1:2
Exhibit 3: me same as above, opponent: 83.9%. I'm present, plus one supporter; he is not.1:1.
Exhibit 4: me same as above, opponent 95.9%, not present. 1:1.
Exhibit 5: me same as above, opponent 106.2, not present. Loss 1:3
Exhibit 6: opponent 99.4%, not present. 1:1.

After about 5 years with this game, I can surely say that it's much closer to slot machine than most people think, and all these formations, sideline orders, condition, morale, etc etc, have only entertainment value.

(The quality percentages of the teams are what T11 shows as of today, it apparently does not capture them at the time of the game and in all history games shows today's values; but it's safe to assume that the gaps were comparable)

Game is broken.... too many results have no reason behind them

[khris]

Here are some recent results just from this season.

Exhibit 1 : Me: 115.4%; opponent: 109.7%. Full condition, top morale, all 10% bonuses. Both managers present. Result: loss 0:6.
Exhibit 2: me same as above, opponent: 106.7%. First game: I'm present, he is not - loss 1:3; 2nd game - both present; loss 1:2
Exhibit 3: me same as above, opponent: 83.9%. I'm present, plus one supporter; he is not.1:1.
Exhibit 4: me same as above, opponent 95.9%, not present. 1:1.
Exhibit 5: me same as above, opponent 106.2, not present. Loss 1:3
Exhibit 6: opponent 99.4%, not present. 1:1.

After about 5 years with this game, I can surely say that it's much closer to slot machine than most people think, and all these formations, sideline orders, condition, morale, etc etc, have only entertainment value.

(The quality percentages of the teams are what T11 shows as of today, it apparently does not capture them at the time of the game and in all history games shows today's values; but it's safe to assume that the gaps were comparable)

I would sugegst you to open a thread with your team stats. I would like to see how MoM you have, goals and assistances. The thing is simple, or works or not, it doesnt matter because all formations can win the treble with the right players. and orders are not related with the oppo options.

[vad]

I would sugegst you to open a thread with your team stats.

OK, will do, starting tonight.