Mythbusters of top eleven

[ibangali]

I'm doing the same thing since last season
I also inform on one of your thread that attend or unattended and home or away problem or trolll or not balanced any more. Even a active manager team manager doesn't attend attend but if I attend before my team lead at least 2 scores then boooommmm; right way unattended manager team receives dop from game engine

[Ποσιδονας]

4) or 5) maybe but shot efficiency depends more from the form and the quality of the players or opponent defenders.

Also a big win bonus could affect 4) and 5) as players are motivated.
A bad morale could give more fouls and a good morale more tackling.

[nikolgiorgos]

Can I aim for a 0-0 result in my game ?
No. Generally I would say that is very difficult to go for a specific result at T11 but this 0-0 it's impossible.
Even if it's between two friends (I 'm talking about official games).
We are in the middle of the season and in my league I can see only one no goals result in all the games.
Weird, 0-0 is one of the most common in real football

[KenoticFC]

Does a multi-position player perform better in a position more than another. I don't have a definite answer since I haven't thought this that much in the past, but in the case of Anton Selenkov i say definetley yes. I bought him at 18yo with the intention of playing him as a DC filling the place of the legendary Gabor Solyom who was also DC DMC. Selenkov has been kinda of a let down and has been a reserve for 2 seasons. In the few matches I've played him as a DMC he has been amazing, maybe coincidence and a result of my formation but still. Today I was saving players for the cup semis so I started him in DC. All match he was having a 6.9 rating. I put him in DMC position and he grows to 7.4 in the next ratings refresh. Maybe this is another case to investigate in the future.

[Cloverfield]

all dc/dmc players perform better in dmc position.

It is not up to the player, it is due to the position itself.
DMC is involved in many aspects of the game, marking, passing, shooting, so his rating can easily be great.
The only time I see dmc completely failing having a bad rating is when he is outclassed by an amc..

On the other hand DCs (when they do not score) they have low rating, you may win, all your team be 7,5+ but yet DCs can stick around 6,5.

[KenoticFC]

all dc/dmc players perform better in dmc position.

It is not up to the player, it is due to the position itself.
DMC is involved in many aspects of the game, marking, passing, shooting, so his rating can easily be great.
The only time I see dmc completely failing having a bad rating is when he is outclassed by an amc..

On the other hand DCs (when they do not score) they have low rating, you may win, all your team be 7,5+ but yet DCs can stick around 6,5.

That's not the case with me. I'm currently using a formation with 2 DMC's and they rarely score yet they have high ratings usually. When they are not performing good I usually swap one for a CM. In his case today the other DC was having a fantastic match with an 8.6 rating (no goal or assist). The same I tend to see with a AML ML AMC player. He usually plays better as an AMC.
I agree with your point that DMC get more involved. So many times during matches you dominate the GK and the defenders will have lower ratings (because they didn't gave to do anything).
I still think this is an interesting factor to look for.

[nikolgiorgos]

Does a multi-position player perform better in a position more than another. I don't have a definite answer since I haven't thought this that much in the past, but in the case of Anton Selenkov i say definetley yes.

yea, well, more than this



Neskens : bought as AMC only, very fast trainer which I gave MC & DMC positions + playmaker.
Usually playing as DMC and some times as my 3rd MC.
I use him in the corner kicks too.

Myths or facts ? :
- You can use any player in a different position from his initial and maybe perform better there
- A playmaker sa helps for corner kicks
- A high or low crossing skill has no effect at corners (the same for all the other skills - lol)
- There aren't good/bad players (if we judge from the rates).
I use Neskens as for C-K . He can give some assists so with that, he gets better rates.
If he was only a simple DMC , he wouldn't have so good rates.
That's why we cannot see if a defender (no kicker) is good or bad.

[Tactician]

You can use any player in a different position from his initial and maybe perform better there
.

From my experiences since I started playing this game, there have been a very rare case where a player performed better when put at another position other than where he is expected to do well according to what information is provided to you visually (attributes, special ability and so on). Way back (around 2 years ago), I had an MC/AMC with shadow striker special ability that was bought from the auction market. He did not perform as expected at AMC position and nothing much at MC position too. I quit playing the game seriously at that time, and I was no longer maintaining my team as such. In some matches, the game put him as DMC when the first team DMC got injured. He had very good ratings, and even better than the DMCs I had in the team. For that particular case, maybe the player was an MC and was trained AMC and the shadow striker special ability, but he turned out to be playing better at DMC position despite being marked out of position.

Then there is another situation: the information provided concerning the player indicates that the player can do well at another position. I had a few players like those. I trained some them that particular position and some of them did well but there were under-performers or players that did not perform as expected too.

But in this game, for certain occasions and even periods, even the players that should not be performing well when put to play at certain positions will unexpectedly do well probably because the game wants that particular team to do well for that occasion or during that period. This includes the fixed matches and the troll matches.

[KenoticFC]

Myths or facts ? :
- You can use any player in a different position from his initial and maybe perform better there
- A playmaker sa helps for corner kicks
- A high or low crossing skill has no effect at corners (the same for all the other skills - lol)
- There aren't good/bad players (if we judge from the rates).
I use Neskens as for C-K . He can give some assists so with that, he gets better rates.
If he was only a simple DMC , he wouldn't have so good rates.
That's why we cannot see if a defender (no kicker) is good or bad.

Niko do you think that certain special abilities work better in certain positions. One playmaker I had was a ML DML whom I bought in the scout market and I didn't see any difference weather in assists or other stats. The same for a RM. Does this mean that the playmaker suits better central playing players.

As far as there are no good or bad players that's kinda true since I've seen even in this forum 3 star veteran players with great performance ratings.
But it's still tricky to have them since its also important to have players of the level you are currently in (otherwise why have the team% rating at all)
That's kinda confusing to me, even if I have a great player who has served me well once his growth stops I feel the need to replace him with a younger higher rated player, maybe that's a mistake but I think these exceptional players that perform well after losing stars are a rarity,

[pcmacdaniel]

yea, well, more than this



Myths or facts ? :
- A high or low crossing skill has no effect at corners (the same for all the other skills - lol)
.

I think when it comes to crosses, the abilities of the players on the end of the cross matter. For example, lets say I have an AML w/ 200% crossing, and a ST w/ 50% finishing. A good corner taker, will give my strikers more opportunities to use his finishing skill, however that corner taker won't increase his 50% finishing skill.