View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 21 of 44 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #201
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    8
    Has anyone tested this formation to confirm legality? -

    --ST ST ST
    AML - - AMR

    DML - - DMR
    --DC DC DC

  2. #202
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by markiinhobr View Post
    I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal
    3w-1-3w-1-2 is a legal formation.
    3n-1-3w-1-2 or 3w-1-3n-1-2 are both legal too.
    3n-1-3n-1-2 would be illegal.

    I hope that answers your question. Although I'm not even sure if you are asking a question because your translator is garbage. The mods might get mad, but I'd suggest posting both the translation and your native language.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  3. #203
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Darren Keighley View Post
    I play:
    GK
    LB CB RB
    CDM CDM
    MC MC
    AMC
    STK STk

    How is not using wingers illegal??
    Jose Mourinho was using this for years at Chelsea with great success, was his tactics illegal???
    You have a player on each flank as I highlighted in bold. So this formation would be legal in T11.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  4. #204
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by mickyb View Post
    Has anyone tested this formation to confirm legality? -

    --ST ST ST
    AML - - AMR

    DML - - DMR
    --DC DC DC
    it meets all the requirements that I'm aware of, but I haven't tested it. You'd still have lousy possession though because of the lack of players at center.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  5. #205
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    34
    So this one (3W-4-2(AML/R)-1) is illegal, right?

  6. #206
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    23
    about an illegal formation
    when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

    ---st---st---
    -aml----amr-
    ---mc--mc---
    -dml----dmr-
    ---dc--dc---
    -----gk-----

    is it still call Illegal..?

  7. #207
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Which of these rules is confusing?




    • Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row )
    • At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the D(L/R), DM(L/R), M(L/R), AM(L/R) slots}
    • at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be an DM* or M*
    • At least 4 players on the opponents side of the pitch.
    • at least 1 Striker
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  8. #208
    Champion fadhul17's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    East java, Indonesia.
    Posts
    2,302
    Quote Originally Posted by andrayen View Post
    about an illegal formation
    when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

    ---st---st---
    -aml----amr-
    ---mc--mc---
    -dml----dmr-
    ---dc--dc---
    -----gk-----

    is it still call Illegal..?
    Yup it's illegal. I hve tested it, and got 20% ball possession.
    My advice remove ur striker to defender. And up to 2dc, down to dc.
    YOU're MANAGER, YOU MANAGE


    Congratulation Arsenal!!
    Hope these thread could help you, Formation-Tactic and GUIDE

  9. #209
    VIP pnr8555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by matcho13579 View Post
    So this one (3W-4-2(AML/R)-1) is illegal, right?
    3 players on flanks, that definitely illegal formation!

    Is red cards illegalise the formation?

    ๑๐
    ทรงพระเจริญ

    AEPRE FC

  10. #210
    Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    70
    i played a superb bot robot, won 3-1 just, he had three gk on the pitch and got 46% possesion, so its all utter rubbish really, beat the top of league yesterday 4-1-3w-1-2 wide diamond with 4-1-1-1-3 by accident, forgot to watch + 5 away team won 2-0 haha this is 5th season and ive spent £13 ! a fool and his football are soon skint, ktf

Page 21 of 44 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast