The power of watching the game!

[Deghinsea]

I would have to agree with rastaman70 on this one. Only statistics are affected by in game changes, not the results. At least this is what my 15-match experiment showed me 2 seasons ago. I used 2 teams of equal quality. One always started the match with legal formation and the other with illegal formation and then swap formations asap. 12 times out of 15 the team that started with the legal formation won the match. The rest of the results were 2 draws and 1 lose. I don't know if they have fixed the engine now but I have stopped bothering too much since then.

[gogs67]

I would have to agree with rastaman70 on this one. Only statistics are affected by in game changes, not the results. At least this is what my 15-match experiment showed me 2 seasons ago. I used 2 teams of equal quality. One always started the match with legal formation and the other with illegal formation and then swap formations asap. 12 times out of 15 the team that started with the legal formation won the match. The rest of the results were 2 draws and 1 lose. I don't know if they have fixed the engine now but I have stopped bothering too much since then.

If the teams are unequal quality (which is what mine was compared to most of the other teams) then it does make a difference. I was playing teams about 10 Q worse than me, I had an illegal formation, they would go 5 or 6 nil up, I would change to 4-4-2, and score 2 or 3 goals without reply. Happened every game.
If teams were equal quality then it didn't make as much difference.

[rastaman70]

I would have to agree with rastaman70 on this one. Only statistics are affected by in game changes, not the results. At least this is what my 15-match experiment showed me 2 seasons ago. I used 2 teams of equal quality. One always started the match with legal formation and the other with illegal formation and then swap formations asap. 12 times out of 15 the team that started with the legal formation won the match. The rest of the results were 2 draws and 1 lose. I don't know if they have fixed the engine now but I have stopped bothering too much since then.

this experiment you have done is exactly what others have done and have come up with the same results. For those of us that still remain ignorant to the fact that the games are predetermined, they need to get their heads out of the sand and start to do the testing for themselves and/or actually pay attention to the results of those that have done the testing and provided results.

@gogs67: there will always be anomalies and they cannot be taken as proof that you are correct. the odds are in favor of matches being predetermined based on the results produced by many people on this forum. I have yet to see someone do this experiment and find results that disprove the theory.

@everyone: by all means, continue to think you can affect matches as it gives you the enjoyment you so duly deserve in a mickey mouse online football predetermined simulation game. oops, left out the word management for some reason...I wonder why?

[gogs67]

this experiment you have done is exactly what others have done and have come up with the same results. For those of us that still remain ignorant to the fact that the games are predetermined, they need to get their heads out of the sand and start to do the testing for themselves and/or actually pay attention to the results of those that have done the testing and provided results.

@gogs67: there will always be anomalies and they cannot be taken as proof that you are correct. the odds are in favor of matches being predetermined based on the results produced by many people on this forum. I have yet to see someone do this experiment and find results that disprove the theory.

?

One minute you say the results are predetermined, next minute you say the odds are in favour of matches being predetermined. Which is it?
I didn't say I was correct, I just told you what I've seen. I am doing these experiments, and they are showing a trend toward being able to influence the result 'in game' in certain situations.
Keep an open mind, it's bad science otherwise.

[rastaman70]

One minute you say the results are predetermined, next minute you say the odds are in favour of matches being predetermined. Which is it?
I didn't say I was correct, I just told you what I've seen. I am doing these experiments, and they are showing a trend toward being able to influence the result 'in game' in certain situations.
Keep an open mind, it's bad science otherwise.

I am saying that the games are predetermined, but for the sake of arguments, I say that the stats are showing that results tend to show as predetermined since we cannot show it 100% for the doubters out there. I hope that clears things up for you.

and I seriously doubt your results show you can influence the game. all results that have been posted up here show the opposite. but by all means, keep trying.