Association turnaments getting boring ?

[nash123]

This can be fixed quite simply by adopting the TM that pro leagues uses, where during certain points of the season, teams can't buy or sell players. And make this the associations tournament. Maybe make it so managers can't sell players and no nordgens are generated, but players can be bought via scouts list and recommended players. .

No, absolutly disagree.
This season, we have world 11 - THE LIONS in there. Their whole FA started at 5*, because there's a 1* team. after the draw, he bought 8 player from the scoutlist, loaned 3 8* player and has now a quality of 126%. The FA raised up to 7*. This isn't much fair to normal tansfermarket. Maybe you think, 8 scouts are expensive - yes, for sure, but in this way it's only pay2win.

The only thing, what makes me wonder: they were only 5* before the draw, why they were put to 3 7* FAs?


I liked FA a lot, but with the beginning of the loan exploit, it got really boring and annoying. Our FA still playing, because of the 100T every month... and not because of fun. Maybe Nordeus can fix it, to become funny again. But I doubt...


I see another 3 possibilities:

-) completly random draw or
-) the punish-draw like new CL: the higher the FA on the raking, the more high quality is the draw:
world 1 is 5*, so they get a draw with 7-8* FA. -> but if this comes, TM has to be closed during the weekend.
-) prizes based on FIFA list, like:
If World 1 (points 1600) plays against 500 (1200 points), #1 got only one token for a victory nothing more, #500 got 1 token for each goal they score, 1 for each draw and 2 for each win. If #500 win, they earn 50 additional.
prizes can be based on the difference of the points or only on the position on the list.
No prizes at the end of the season.

[nikolgiorgos]

I liked FA a lot, but with the beginning of the loan exploit, it got really boring and annoying. Our FA still playing, because of the 100T every month... and not because of fun. Maybe Nordeus can fix it, to become funny again. But I doubt...


I see another 3 possibilities:

-) completly random draw or
-) the punish-draw like new CL: the higher the FA on the raking, the more high quality is the draw:
world 1 is 5*, so they get a draw with 7-8* FA. -> but if this comes, TM has to be closed during the weekend.
-) prizes based on FIFA list, like:
If World 1 (points 1600) plays against 500 (1200 points), #1 got only one token for a victory nothing more, #500 got 1 token for each goal they score, 1 for each draw and 2 for each win. If #500 win, they earn 50 additional.
prizes can be based on the difference of the points or only on the position on the list.
No prizes at the end of the season.

I agree with you nash.
There is no fun for me, I play only for the reward and not let down my team mates.

I agree with the 1st and 3rd suggestion, not agree with the 2nd cause this can lead to a different type of manipulation.

Generally I 'm not against of every kind of manipulation in the other competitions (that's another discussion ), but at least asso games must be to have fun.

[pcmacdaniel]

No, absolutly disagree.
This season, we have world 11 - THE LIONS in there. Their whole FA started at 5*, because there's a 1* team. after the draw, he bought 8 player from the scoutlist, loaned 3 8* player and has now a quality of 126%. The FA raised up to 7*. This isn't much fair to normal tansfermarket. Maybe you think, 8 scouts are expensive - yes, for sure, but in this way it's only pay2win.

The only thing, what makes me wonder: they were only 5* before the draw, why they were put to 3 7* FAs?

5* association placed with three 7* FA's? Hmmm...., that's very interesting. Maybe nordeus is dropping the quality of the lowest quality team for the purpose of calculating the draw? Or they're flagging statistical outliers? I don't know, for sure, it's very interesting however. I know in mine, we've had bad draws lately, and its a 15% quality gap between our 5 and 6 seeds. Our 6 seed is still around 103% however.