Skill progress

[Buffs Mad]

I believe mentality and tactics decide amount of player condition loss (CA and pressing, attack focus, arrows). I almost always play CA down both flanks, and my wingers lose the most condition per game, no matter what rating they get. Condition loss per game range is approximately 16-25%. Also, mentality of your opponent, strength of direct player's opponent and how much hes motivated to play, affect condition too.

Agreed, many many factors can collide.

When I had spoken to t11 last night I decided to do a couple of friendlies. Condition burn on the winning team was between 8-12 and 9-13 on the losing side. The Striker on the winning team used only 8% condition. In a hard drawn CL match this morning my main team went through 17-26 from lazy to hardest working.

Since I play v stle a lot and sometimes counterattack, always flanks, my wingers and wide backs work hard too.

[Steppenwolf]

Agreed, many many factors can collide.

When I had spoken to t11 last night I decided to do a couple of friendlies. Condition burn on the winning team was between 8-12 and 9-13 on the losing side. The Striker on the winning team used only 8% condition. In a hard drawn CL match this morning my main team went through 17-26 from lazy to hardest working.

Since I play v stle a lot and sometimes counterattack, always flanks, my wingers and wide backs work hard too.

8-12 and 9-13... so range for both teams was 8-13... It seems that range for official game is 16-26%, and for friendlies is half of it... I wonder if SP gain range in friendlies is half of SP gain range in official games?

[Buffs Mad]

8-12 and 9-13... so range for both teams was 8-13... It seems that range for official game is 16-26%, and for friendlies is half of it... I wonder if SP gain range in friendlies is half of SP gain range in official games?

I'd guess that yes it will be half'ish because if SP gain is predominately rate and condition - since rate is fixed and condition is halved (on average)...... But we'd need to record loads of matches because there would still be the usual variation applied to 'training' and I don't think I have the appetite for that .

Just from the 2 friendly games I played - both sides hosting 1.

On the one team that doesn't buy players but instead signs Academy youths (too many teams to manage them all ) in the friendly the fast trainers recorded 72, 67, 69, 68, 77 (condition burn was 13, 13, 9, 12, 9) which was more consistent than i expected. The fastest trainer got 77 using only 9 condition.

On the other team I've no idea who is fast or slow training because I manage them purely on performance and buy sell regularly - but 6 players gained between 60-75.

[Buffs Mad]

I'd guess that yes it will be half'ish because if SP gain is predominately rate and condition.......

But I have a question.

At what point in my life did I start typing predominately instead of predominantly? >.< That's twice recently I've noticed that. O.o

[Steppenwolf]

But I have a question.

At what point in my life did I start typing predominately instead of predominantly? >.< That's twice recently I've noticed that. O.o

Dat's cuz yer heid is in Poland awready lol